Digging up RPG

[blackheart]

Shorter posts are a good idea, most people just don't have time to sift through long winded stories.

 

[BCLG100]

i agree that their have to be certain limits, but not such that it hinderances on the rpg aspect. what would really help would be if it wasnt just me and strider talking by ourselves for pretty much a whole page

 

[Zarn]

I believe in a loose format for a rpg, but there should still be limits. No sabers, spawning regiments out of no where, superpowers, etc...

 

[BCLG100]

okay for the last page i think we have all been pretty much repeating the same thing,
so whats the next step?
do we produce a poll whther citizens want a new forum for it? then beg TF for the use of a forum, or the other way round.

or

do we just carry on in the citizens forum where in reality not much is happening?

imput would be good.

 

[Zarn]

okay for the last page i think we have all been pretty much repeating the same thing,
so whats the next step?
do we produce a poll whther citizens want a new forum for it? then beg TF for the use of a forum, or the other way round.

or

do we just carry on in the citizens forum where in reality not much is happening?

imput would be good.

Poll it first. Without support, I don't think TF would even consider doing it.

 

[BCLG100]

yes but i meant it as in, if we didnt have the opportunity of a forum there wouldnt be much point in posting a poll.

 

[Strider]

I say we poll it first, and not with several RPG options. We know everyone prefers a story-like RPG, so were stick to that.

Just a simple poll "Would you like a Story-based RPG" Yes, No, Abstain.

 

[BCLG100]

There has been a preliminary poll posted here, just to gauge citizens reactions to the idea of seperate forums.

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=96774

 

[Black_Hole]

After much rule discussion on irc we have posted a thread for the headquarters here:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=96784