Diplomacy Log: UniversCiv

[2metraninja]

Received

Lala Civilization

Mar 9 (3 days ago)

to me
Hi,

I think our city would be fine... but where would you found yours so that they don't interfere too much?
By the way we find a NAP till turn 140 is a bit short. Would you mind extending to, say, turn 170?

Yuufo

 

[2metraninja]

Reply sent:

CivFanatics Team <diplo.civfanatics@gmail.com> (sent by dimo.neykov@gmail.com)

9:31 AM (0 minutes ago)

to Lala
Greetings, Team UCiv

Here is a map with the location of your Elephant city and our Marble city. M=Mountain, e=Elephant, U=Uciv City, C=CFC city.

MM====
MeMU==
M=M===
=M====
=====C

We accept your offer of a NAP until turn 170. We also suggest a NAP extension until after turn 200. Please confirm the NAP until after turn 170 and let us know whether you agree to extend it to after turn 200.

Team CFC

 

[Caledorn]

Message received 14.03.2013 (it's PI day!)

Hi,

Thanks for your NAP offer, we agree for the NAP until turn 200
I think your city would be OK.
We would just like to found a second city like this :

MM====
MeMU==U
M=M===
=M====
=====C

or like that:

MM====
MeMU===U
M=M===
=M====
=====C

Bye, Yuufo

 

[2metraninja]

3 last messages:

CivFanatics Team <diplo.civfanatics@gmail.com>

Mar 15 (4 days ago)

to Lala
Just letting you know that we've received the message and that it's posted in the team forums - you should get a response within a day to this.

Caledorn, Foreign Minister of Team CFC
Lala Civilization

Mar 15 (4 days ago)

to me
Fine. No hurry

Since our relations are good, we would like to suggest to open our borders for trade. The great river flowing between us would convey our trading ships and bring both of us a lot of trade revenues.

Yuufo
CivFanatics Team <diplo.civfanatics@gmail.com> (sent by dimo.neykov@gmail.com)

8:32 AM (0 minutes ago)

to Lala
We welcome the NAP and newly opened borders between our nations to strengthen our friendship.

As for settling our border area, we agreed to one exception to the no-settling border area for you, but your second proposed city will be second settled in the same no-settling border area which idea was to not allow cluttering of cities and fighting cultures which can make tensions in our otherwise perfect neighborhood.

We would be happy you to settle your second city for bananas and gems on the north bank of the salt lake to leave our Marble city a bit of green land to feed on. Or if you prefer to have your banana/gems city in the no- settling border area, you can move your Elephant city west of the mountains to leave some green land for our marble city which otherwise would be under culture pressure from two your cities.

Please inform us which variant you choose.

Team CFC

 

[YossarianLives]

Message received from UCiv 23.3.13

Hi,
I am afraid neither of these variants suits us
But we don't plan to found the banana-gem city for a long time.

Yuufo

 

[Caledorn]

Message sent to UCiv 15.05.2013

Hi UniversCiv,

Our open borders with RB is a clause of our current NAP treaty with Team RB. We really like your idea of everyone closing their borders with Team RB, but unfortunately we cannot close the borders without breaking the deal, and we take keeping our word seriously. Have you discussed this idea with any other teams, and if you have how has the responses been?

We fully agree with you that the Team RB must be stopped though, and when our NAP with them runs out on turn 175, we are very interested in cooperating against Team RB. We believe that practically every team must work together to contain their advance.

Caledorn, on behalf of Team CFC