TwoShedsJackson
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2007
- Messages
- 63
As I've just reached the difficulty level where dot mapping becomes useful I wondered if someone could clarify something for me:
the value of a square is counted as it's difference from two food either way, right? So grassland is even, as are coasts and ocean once you have a lighthouse, hills are -1 with grassland and -2 if plains, deserts and peaks are ignored. Resource tiles are counted as what they produce above 2 once improved.
First off, do you include the square the city itself is on when counting, i.e. is it counted as a 0 because it produces two food, or is +2 added to the total as this is a 'free' square that isn't using a population point to work it?
Also, as you disregard peaks and deserts, is the final figure you come up with for a city that contains some of these, the total farms needed to reach the maximum size less these tiles? i.e. if there were three peaks in the cross, does the final number you come out with in this instance indicate the farms needed to reach size 17 as opposed to size 20?
the value of a square is counted as it's difference from two food either way, right? So grassland is even, as are coasts and ocean once you have a lighthouse, hills are -1 with grassland and -2 if plains, deserts and peaks are ignored. Resource tiles are counted as what they produce above 2 once improved.
First off, do you include the square the city itself is on when counting, i.e. is it counted as a 0 because it produces two food, or is +2 added to the total as this is a 'free' square that isn't using a population point to work it?
Also, as you disregard peaks and deserts, is the final figure you come up with for a city that contains some of these, the total farms needed to reach the maximum size less these tiles? i.e. if there were three peaks in the cross, does the final number you come out with in this instance indicate the farms needed to reach size 17 as opposed to size 20?