Archbob
Ancient CFC Guardian
So combining biblical history and scholarly history a bit here.
The dates for the Exodus of Israel from Egypt are uncertain and there has been much debate as whether it was an earlier date(1400-1500 BC) or a later date(1200s BC). Some bible references favor the older date and say and thus the Pharaoh would be Thutmose III or possibly one of the earliest Pharaohs who expelled the Hyksos, Ahmose I.
However, looking back at the evidence of the times of the earliest Israelite settlements in the promised land and the situation at the time, I favor the later dates of the Exodus, possibly under the reign of Ramses II(The great) or his father Seti I. The earliest settlements of the Israelites(Presumably Joshua's conquests) don't appear until around 1200 BC so it makes sense for a 1200s date for the Exodus.
Also the earlier date coincide too much with the Hyksos invasion so there wouldn't have been a Pharoah at that time to oppress the Israelites. It would have been a Hyksos ruler oppressing Egyptians and Israelites.
Some historians argue that the Israelites were the Hyksos were the Israelites but that doesn't make much sense since the Israelites were described as the oppressed instead of the oppressors.
My closest guess would be that the Exodus happened under the reign of Ramses the Great. The geographical and tribal evidence also seem to support this and it would have made a perfect time for the Exodus. At this time there was no real power in Canaan. Canaan was a bit too far for Egypt to truly have too much power over at the time. The other major power, the Hittites, had been drained somewhat of manpower after war with Egypt(Ramses II is called the great largely because he made peace with the Hittites). Also the area was technically part of the "Egyptian empire" so Hittite influence was limited. So that leaves Canaan with a bunch of scattered tribes at the time with no real power to unite them which would make them alot easier to conquer for Joshua.
What are you guy's thoughts?
The dates for the Exodus of Israel from Egypt are uncertain and there has been much debate as whether it was an earlier date(1400-1500 BC) or a later date(1200s BC). Some bible references favor the older date and say and thus the Pharaoh would be Thutmose III or possibly one of the earliest Pharaohs who expelled the Hyksos, Ahmose I.
However, looking back at the evidence of the times of the earliest Israelite settlements in the promised land and the situation at the time, I favor the later dates of the Exodus, possibly under the reign of Ramses II(The great) or his father Seti I. The earliest settlements of the Israelites(Presumably Joshua's conquests) don't appear until around 1200 BC so it makes sense for a 1200s date for the Exodus.
Also the earlier date coincide too much with the Hyksos invasion so there wouldn't have been a Pharoah at that time to oppress the Israelites. It would have been a Hyksos ruler oppressing Egyptians and Israelites.
Some historians argue that the Israelites were the Hyksos were the Israelites but that doesn't make much sense since the Israelites were described as the oppressed instead of the oppressors.
My closest guess would be that the Exodus happened under the reign of Ramses the Great. The geographical and tribal evidence also seem to support this and it would have made a perfect time for the Exodus. At this time there was no real power in Canaan. Canaan was a bit too far for Egypt to truly have too much power over at the time. The other major power, the Hittites, had been drained somewhat of manpower after war with Egypt(Ramses II is called the great largely because he made peace with the Hittites). Also the area was technically part of the "Egyptian empire" so Hittite influence was limited. So that leaves Canaan with a bunch of scattered tribes at the time with no real power to unite them which would make them alot easier to conquer for Joshua.
What are you guy's thoughts?