DJ_Tanner
Emperor
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 1,098
I'm guessing that the idea was to add another female leader to the stable, but ironically both of the leaders she replaces are already female.
Then it is pretty clear that was not the idea.
I'm guessing that the idea was to add another female leader to the stable, but ironically both of the leaders she replaces are already female.
Yes, but would have liked to see them a bit farther apart in age.
The more I think about this ability, the more it seems completely negligible at just -1.
I'm not sure why Firaxis is so meager with the loyalty bonuses when they are quite happy to give massive military bonuses etc to civs.
Do they not realize loyalty does very little in most games? Or is it that loyalty abilities can be OP in AI vs AI?
I am hoping that the French version sprinkles in the occasional English word and vice versa for the English version.
In that case, they should have chosen a figure who was, y'know, actually a leader of the nations in question. Eleanor was never the leader of either France or England.Then it is pretty clear that was not the idea.
Cleo is the hot girl in college you have sex with, Eleanor is the cute girl you bring home to the parents and marry.
lol "controversy"
Most of the comments are about how interesting the dual leader is and/or how attractive she is.
Oh absolutely there are a couple that do sprinkle in multiple languages and it makes sense, it may or may not be all that historically accurate to how she would have behaved, but I think it makes a nice nod to her duel leader status.You'll probably expect that more with Laurier than with Eleanor.
Leader still does not equal ruler.In that case, they should have chosen a figure who was, y'know, actually a leader of the nations in question. Eleanor was never the leader of either France or England.
She has the best character model in Gathering Storm in my opinion. Looks like Alexander with hair similarities. It is going to be horrible near her in a Dark Age. Luckily she has no bomuses towards warfare in either incarnation so that would be the best case to wipe her off the map before she starts flipping your cities.
Hmm....
Found a religion, get Cathedrals. Build Holy Sites and Theatre Districts in every city. 7 total GS in city seems doable for -7 loyalty in nearby cities of other civs. More if you have music and/or wonders. Combine the GW pressure from 2 cities and flipping cities seems doable. Especially if you add in spies and entertainment districts.
Welll, if "science focus" equates to a "here's some blue icons" ability, then I guess so, but I don't think excelling at science requires such a ham-handed approach. Cultural victory requires tourism, a resource specific to the victory condition. Science is as ubiquitous as a resource gets.
If you can excel at producing districts or buildings or settlers, you can excel at science. We have GS civ's that are good at those things.
OOFThen she divorced you, takes half your stuff, and marries a guy you hated back in college.
Eleanor’s design seems pretty cool and I’m all for leaders being of multiple civilisations, but I can’t be that enthusiastic knowing this is essentially Firaxis’ way of giving both England and France new leaders with minimum effort. It’s now all but guaranteed we won’t be seeing Napoleon, Charles de Gaulle, Churchill, Elizabeth, or any other iconic leader from these nations. That hurts as I think Civ VI’s art style would have really shined with these characters.
In fairness, beyond commenting on whether and in what ways the LUA is interesting, and whether people like the model, what would you like discussed?
Eh, wasn't her Majesty Queen Victoria from House of Hannover, which came from Germany?
lol "controversy"
Most of the comments are about how interesting the dual leader is and/or how attractive she is.