Embassy SANCTA - discussion

[DaveShack]

This type of letter is the kind I was hoping to not share with the allies. Perhaps an edited version at most?

 

[HUSch]

This type of letter is the kind I was hoping to not share with the allies. Perhaps an edited version at most?

I agree with you

 

[peter grimes]

It has not been shared.

 

[peter grimes]

Here's the letter I just got from General_W.

Spoiler :

Namaste Peter.
The Ninajs salute the Mad Scientists.

So, here’s pretty much where we’re at:

1. March 3 Contact between Mad Scientists and SANCTA. Chat in-game with HUSch. Formal letter sent.
2. March 4 Positive response from MS. Peace negotiations start.
3. March 7 Formal peace treaty sent from SANCTA to MS for signature.
4. March 9 After 2 days of silence, General_W sends a note to Peter asking to chat.
5. March 12 After 5 days of silence, General_W sends another note to Peter asking for a response of any kind.
6. March 13 Finally receive an informal note saying MS likes the treaty. Promises that, “Signed copy will follow this weekend at the latest.” (ie, tomorrow or the next day)
7. March 17 After 4 days of silence, General_W sends an official note asking about the treaty and other issues. A sample seal to sign the treaty is provided to try to help.
8. March 25 After 12 days of silence, General_W asks Peter in a chat if we’re being avoided on purpose. Peter offers to chat that night. [didn’t happen]
9. March 27 2 more days, and counting, of total silence.

Is that about right?

We like to think we’re not dense… and this looks like a pretty clear message.
Are we wrong?

-- General_W, Daimyo of State, SANCTA

I don't know what to do here - anyone want to attempt a reply??

 

[HUSch]

We get a tech-proposal from SANCTA.
Aesthetics and Literature (448 + 299 ) for HBR (373) or 130 .

Aesthetics has our ally Kaz, perhaps Literature also.

What kind of answer should we give? I would decline and tell them about the cancelling of oB.

I need some support from you.