Europe in 2002

I was just looking for my outline of a future European scenario depicting the break-up of the EU, but alas, it appears I have deleted it. With good reason because I'm never likely to make the damn thing...too many other projects in line first.

Anyway, basically European politics at the moment are comparable to that of the USA in the period before 1860 with the evolution of a stronger federal power and the conflict with state sovereignty. You guys had to fight a civil war for four years before establishing the supremacy of federal institutions; my idea for Europe was that a similar breaking point would happen and fracture the Union. Perhaps a treaty is negotiated that would transfer final sovereignty to Brussels, but certain Eurosceptic powers refuse to ratify. The European Commission decides that the treaty is legitimate anyway and that the other states are rebelling. The rebel states mobilize their armed forces, and defy federal authority in a staged incident (such as firing on a federal warship). This leads to ful-blown civil war to settle the dispute.

Now this raises some rather interesting possibilities: Russia lurks on the sidelines and tries to win back her old influence over the Baltic and Central European states. Turkey nurses old grudges at failing to have her candidacy recognised, and considers annexing the remaining half of Cyprus (which by then would be in the EU). America dithers (as usual).

I can see some education is required for non EU citizens:
The CIS hardly functions as a diplomatic body. It refers only to ex-Soviet states, not Soviet satellites.
With the exception of Switzerland (and Norway until her oil runs lower), all European countries want to join the Union. As does Turkey, as does Morrocco.

Oh yes: division of countries.

Eurosceptics: Britain, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Spain (increasingly)

Core-European (federals): France, Germany, Benelux countries, Italy, all the recent applicants.

Not sure about Portugal: doesn't make the news much. Also Ireland is unclear after their voters initial rejection of the Nice treaty, though this has now been ratified.

What do you think?

edit: all the pundits are saying that the EU will go from 15 to 28 members in a new round of admissions "perhaps" in 2007. The lagards are currently Bulgaria and Romania. Turkey hasn't yet cleared the first hurdle of negotiations, so that might take a bit longer.
 
Brilliant, APL. Simply brilliant. Oh I wish you would be doing that scenario... I would love it, I'm sure! :goodjob:

BTW, could you tell me the name of the piece of music in the Fanfare2.wav in the Crises sounds?
 
That sounds great Andrew. Just one thing, don't you think Finland should be on the Federalistic side? They are the only scandi country to be in the EMU and AFAI remember they were one of the most positive to EU when they voted on joining or not.

It sure would be fun playing but it's just hard to imagine the Swedish PM uprising against Brussels. :lol: We Swedes are very peaceful. ;)
 
Originally posted by Andrew Livings
...
Oh yes: division of countries.

Eurosceptics: Britain, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Spain (increasingly)

Core-European (federals): France, Germany, Benelux countries, Italy, all the recent applicants.

...

Sorry, but I must not disagree. Spain is a heavy EU supporter. As you can see on Eurobarometer 57 - Highlights

http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb57/eb57_en.htm

UE support on Spain is even higher than France or Germany...
 
I've got a half-complted scenario on the break up of the EU as well - it's available from my webpage (check out the link in my profile)
 
...And hopefully Norway will join the union soon as well. We've only said no twice. What's up with that? :confused:
 
insurgent: Fanfare2 is the "Ode to Joy" movement from Beethoven's 9th Symphony. This was adopted by the European Council as their anthem.

Pavlov: I put Finland in this category only because she was not in the first round of EMU entry. I can't imagine any country uprising against Brussels whilst the North Atlantic Treaty remains in effect, so this idea does lose one degree of credibility.

Archer: In a future European civil war I don't see any third way for the EU members: they'd either accept federal supremacy or they'd resist it. For the other players you might have Russia, USA, Turkey, non-EU members (Iceland, Switzerland, Norway, Bulgaria, Romania, Albania, and the ex-Yugoslav states minus Slovenia). Then you'd still have other countries on the periphery, especially in the Near East. How would this affect Israel?

Yaroslav: Spain may be a big EU enthusiast while she continues to suck up so much federal funding, but her government is also heavily against surrendering power. Just look at Aznar's anitcs at Nice about redistributing votes in the Council.

I think questions about divisions should also look at other factors which shape public and government opinion. In the Finns case, isn't there a degree of security from Russia involved? In the Spanish and Irish case, will public enthusiasm survive a redistribution of social funding after expansion?

Case: checked out your scenario. Might have some business for your page. Don't you think the tech tree from Crises would be more appropriate?

I don't mind anyone using stuff from Crises or the Atomic Age in any post-war scenarios.
 
Originally posted by Andrew Livings
insurgent: Fanfare2 is the "Ode to Joy" movement from Beethoven's 9th Symphony. This was adopted by the European Council as their anthem.

Doh! Sorry, of course. That's the theme in the 4th movement of the 9th Symphony by Beethoven. I meant Fanfare1.wav :cry: :D :lol:
 
Originally posted by insurgent


Doh! Sorry, of course. That's the theme in the 4th movement of the 9th Symphony by Beethoven. I meant Fanfare1.wav :cry: :D :lol:

It's the US anthem. 'Starspangled banner'(?).
 
Thanks once again Andrew. I did realized there was only 2 ways for EU division. The map i'm using doesn't include any of America, but your other ideas for nations as similar to what i was thinking, so i'll us them.
 
Just don't put central europeans to CIS. We have nothing to do with it. BTW all central europans countries have about 100 mln people, 2/3 of russian population, and are stronger economically them Russia, so don't make them some suburbs of Great Russia, because they are much more that that.
 
Originally posted by Pavlov
It's the US anthem. 'Starspangled banner'(?).

How strange. That's not the one in my version. It must be an older version...
I downloaded the new version and now it's fanfare6.wav. Now it is positive. Double doh! The melody I'm looking for is fanfare6.wav.
:cry: :eek: :lol: :crazyeye:


So, archer, are you going to use APL's concept?
 
Originally posted by insurgent


How strange. That's not the one in my version. It must be an older version...
I downloaded the new version and now it's fanfare6.wav. Now it is positive. Double doh! The melody I'm looking for is fanfare6.wav.
:cry: :eek: :lol: :crazyeye:

Ah. No, I have no idea what fanfare 6 is. Sounds like marching music.
 
Originally posted by Andrew Livings
Case: checked out your scenario. Might have some business for your page. Don't you think the tech tree from Crises would be more appropriate?

From memory, I prefered the Atomic Age tech tree as it was more generic then the crisises one (Both are fanastic though)
 
A few suggestions about Scandinavia:

Insurgent's Gripen idea was superb.
The standard fighter for Scandinavia before that then... Let's see, Denmark and Norway use the F-16, Sweden has the AJ-37 and Finland has the F-18...
Why not put these different planes in the nations who posess them, but not let them build more, and let them wait for Gripen?
The standard tank should be Leopard II, and Stockholm should be capital. (;) :D)

Hmm, i thought i'd have more, oh well.
 
Originally posted by Andrew Livings


Yaroslav: Spain may be a big EU enthusiast while she continues to suck up so much federal funding, but her government is also heavily against surrendering power. Just look at Aznar's anitcs at Nice about redistributing votes in the Council.

I think questions about divisions should also look at other factors which shape public and government opinion. In the Finns case, isn't there a degree of security from Russia involved? In the Spanish and Irish case, will public enthusiasm survive a redistribution of social funding after expansion?


First of all, sorry for the delay. I miss your post (don't ask why, I don't know).

I can not speak about Irish people, but for Spain, EU is much more than funds (altough we love them). In fact, for Spain, EU stands for democracy and stability (things that we have not until XX century end), so Spanish people would support EU even if we lose funds! The link that I quote on my last post shows that Spanish people strongly support an EU with the new countries ;)

And yes, Aznar was very aggresive on Nize, but it's because he the same power that Italy has ;)

Sorry for the thread-hijacking
 
The Swedes should have stealth ships (much like a large gun-boat). I think Mikoyan must be able to supply you with pictures...
Denmark hasn't got any ships larger than her three corvettes. We used to have a frigate or two, but not anymore... :(

Will you be using the APL scenario concept, archer? If so, then Denmark, Sweden, and Finland will be under the rebel civ, right? So I suppose the capital will be London...
 
Back
Top Bottom