• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.

For the LAST time - Hitler was a Lefty!

Status
Not open for further replies.

John Wayne USA

Duke says 'Lets Roll!'
Joined
May 19, 2003
Messages
116
Location
The USA and proud of it!
Ok everyone, repeat after me - Adolf Hitler was a LEFTY!

What did the NAZI party stand for? National Socialist Workers Party!

Note the word "SOCIALIST."

I know this is very difficult for people to accept but Hitler was indeed a very left wing guy. I'm sure some people will say, "but he's not a REAL socialist...." But then again, WHO is? Not Stalin, Not Mao, Not Fidel........ so in their minds they would rather dream about a perfection that will never be, rather then face historical truths.

And here's the dealbreaker - Hitler and Stalin were able to become ALLIES. I wonder why..........
 
"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

It ain't Uncle Joe who said that...
 
Originally posted by John Wayne USA
Ok everyone, repeat after me - Adolf Hitler was a LEFTY!

I once tried to suggest this idea to my ehrm.. "eccentric" college professor (i was taking a "modern history" class). He just laghed at me for suggesting this idea and said I should read some books on politics. (And no, he was not a "leftie")

But it all made sense to me, and it still does. He was no capitalist, thats for sure. And the german state had control over all the industry, media and so on.

However, if your a nationalist you cannot be a communist. Communism is all about a "revolution to unite the world in a global community". Soviet would not kill 6.000.000 jews for being jewish. (I know the soviet was not exactly "nice" to its people, but they had very different reasons to be inhumane) The communists does not believe in racial differences, or even the idea of national differences.


.: Cilpot
 
Stalin called for "socialism in one country" - does this mean he was NOT a communist rather that he was a hypernationalist? It was pretty clear that Stalin would kill people regardless of race or religion or language.
 
Hitler wasn't communist. Maybe leftist but not communist.

The Nazi party, although the "Socialist" party in name, wasn't socialist in the way you suggest. It was more of a group that indicated social problems, and offered up some not-so-nice ways to fix them.

Edited for clarification.
 
Im not arguing that stalin didnt kill people. Not at all.

I know, however, that stalin tried (when his country was at the verge of loosing to the nazis) to get his people to "fight for their country" and "cherich the russian state" and so on. He reluctantly did this as it opposed what he believed in.
 
Hitler hates the communists and the socialists almost as hard as he hates the jews.

I also think he made an alliance with the right-wings parties of Germany.
 
Saying hitler belonged to the "left" because he had socialist in his party's name is about as empty of anything remotely approaching sense as saying east germany was democratic because that was part of its full name. Or saying that China or Korea are republics. Or saying there's anything compassionate in Bush's compassionate conservatism.

It's just a name tag. It'S the policy that he actually used that matter. If you can prove he was really from the left by those policies, feel free to do so.

Saying he was a "lefty" just because he had socialist in his party name is just plain laughable.
 
Ok everyone, repeat after me - Adolf Hitler was a LEFTY!

Hitler's economic policies were indeed leftist. He abhored capitalism and Facist Germany indeed employed leftist ideas in the running of the state in the sense that most people were employed in service of Germany. However, his social polices were most certainly right-wing. He was also nationalistic, another trait of a right wing government. Also, Hitler was a dictator and believed in the need for a strong dictatorship.

Hitler was a facist. Facism incorporates ideas from both the left and right in it's ideals. It is incorrect to call him a lefty just as would be incorrect to label him a ardent right-winger without first defining the "wings" properly.

What did the NAZI party stand for? National Socialist Workers Party!

Note the word "SOCIALIST."

Hitler belived in Social Darwinism i.e. strong races would survive at the expense of weaker ones (Jews). He was not a socialist as we know it today - that is, interested in creating equality amongst men regardless of race, gender etc.

I know this is very difficult for people to accept but Hitler was indeed a very left wing guy. I'm sure some people will say, "but he's not a REAL socialist...." But then again, WHO is? Not Stalin, Not Mao, Not Fidel........ so in their minds they would rather dream about a perfection that will never be, rather then face historical truths.

This debate (on the merits of Communism/Socialism) is taking place in another thread and is entirely OT here.

And here's the dealbreaker - Hitler and Stalin were able to become ALLIES. I wonder why..........

Ou of neccesity rather than any strong ideological bond. Hitler didn't want to fight Russia until Western Europe was pacifier. Stalin wasn't ready to fight Hitler in 1939. They never co-operated to any degree and it is debatable whether the term "allies" is even appropriate.

This post seems to be implying that because Hitler was supposedly a Socialist, it nullifies any validity in this train of thought. However, I am merely reading between the lines and will not comment further on this...

:)
 
The Socialist bit of the Nazi party was often ignored by Hitler as he actively courted German Businessmen for funds and actively targettted the meccas of Socialism, Leningrad and Stalingrad.:p
 
'Hitler was a lefty'

'Hitler was bad'

ergo lefties are bad, right ?

I know a mod who won't appreciate this :lol: Funny there should just be a thread devoted to faulty logic in the OT Forum.

Seriously, I'm still looking for the 'mother of all rolleyes'-smiley !
 
Fascism doesn't really mean anything anyway - except heavy doses of dictatorship, racism, nationalism, opposition-squashing and lots of tough Big Brother type societal rules. So yes, Hitler was a fascist.
 
I don't know why I'm bothering responding to an obvious troll DL, but here goes:

Originally posted by John Wayne USA
Ok everyone, repeat after me - Adolf Hitler was a LEFTY!

What did the NAZI party stand for? National Socialist Workers Party!

Note the word "SOCIALIST."

Urm, you may actually want to look at Hitlers actions upon gaining office (which, incidentley, he achieved largely by campaigning against socialism and communism). Aside from imprisoning and/or killing every communist and socialist he could get his hands on, Hitler also introduced some very ugly laws which essentially made workers the property of their bosses. That's the exact opposite of what a socialist would do.

And here's the dealbreaker - Hitler and Stalin were able to become ALLIES. I wonder why..........

Because Hitler wanted to neutralise the threat from the USSR while he focused on Poland and France, and Stalin wanted a slice of Poland and the Germans to promise not to attack him and give him a free hand in Finland and the Baltic states. As such, the German-Soviet alliance was purely driven by pragmatism. The events of June 22 1941 are a pretty clear indication that Hitler wasn't actually all that comitted to the German-Soviet alliance ;)

Anyway, by your reasoning Churchill was a socialist. After all, he formed a government with a party nominally dedicated to socialism (the bi-partisan war cabinet with Labour) and he was involved in close cooperation with the USSR.
 
Why are so many people wildly against the idea that some of Hitlers ideology was far left? The guys philosophies were as complicated as they were abhorrent, and included many viewpoints that would today be considered conflicting.

Oh and re Churchill, he changed party at least once so he was hardly a one level guy either.
 
Originally posted by Kentonio
Why are so many people wildly against the idea that some of Hitlers ideology was far left?
The main socialistic idea is that "Everyone should be equel". Thats not exactly the way Hitler thought.
 
Why are so many people wildly against the idea that some of Hitlers ideology was far left?

Because most of the Nazu idealology, and almost all of Hitler's actions were actually ultra-right.

Hitler introduced some rather enlightened animal rights laws and enviromental regulations. Yet in light of the countless policy diffences between the parties, no sencible person would claim that Green Parties are actually Nazis in disguise. Why reverse this by claiming that the Nazis are actually left wingers in disguise?

Hitler oversaw the development of a rather good highway system. Does this mean that almost every pro-highway major western political party since 1945 is somehow facist? Of course not.

While Hitler's actions and idealologies may have contained some elements of left wing thinking, this certainly doesn't make Hitler any kind of left winger: he's best described as a romantic and violently dogmatic arch-reactionary.
 
Ok everyone, repeat after me

Nice way of starting a thread which is supposed to praise democracy. "Repeat after me, don't you dare think for yourself."

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the
economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to
wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this
system under all conditions."


It ain't Uncle Joe who said that...

So you believe in what he said?

First of all, Hitler was right-winged. Yes, he was. His party, the NSDAP (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, engl. National socialist german worker's party) was right-winged. It was nationalist. It was considered by the people of the time to be right-winged. It was considered by themselves to be right-winged.
It was just as right-winged as the modern-day right-winged german parties, the NPD, the DVU and the Republikaner.
Yes, it was.
Now, two things in the party's name should strike you. Not only the "socialist", but also the "worker's". Next time, check your knowledge before you begin trolling.
The NSDAP was not socialist. It was national socialist. In German, it is called "Nationalsozialistisch", not "National-sozialistisch", "Nationale sozialistische Partei" or anything else. There is a striking difference. It's one word, not two. If they were nationals and socialists, they'd have called themselves "Nationale Sozialistische... Partei". It's the same with today's NPD= Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschland. Translated, that's National Democratic... but this party isn't democratic. Before you begin trolling again, I'd suggest you'd learn some German.
Now, where's the difference between national socialism and socialism? Here it is:
Yes, there are some basic resemblances between national socialism and socialism/communism. I admit that, even though I'm a leftist. One principle would be, that the people should be treated equally and socially.
BUT
This counts only for the German people. Socialism/Communism is meant for the entire world, the principle that all are equal, not all Germans are equal. This is a very important difference.
Hitler and his party was racist. The Communists obviously aren't. Persecution in so-called communist states were not against ethnic groups. They were against political and religious groups.
Wait... religious? Didn't the Germans also persecute Jews?
Yes, they did. But they didn't regard the Jews as a religious, but as an ethnic group.

One of the ways the NSDAP came to power was by promising to give labour to everyone. Piece of cake. There were 6 million unemployed in Germany in 1932. Preparing a war would need at least that much.
The socialists are also fighting against unemployment, but they're not preparing a war.

Now... yes, Hitler allied with Stalin. But Stalin wasn't a clean communist.
No he wasn't, no he wasn't, no he wasn't, no he wasn't.
The greatest mistake of so-called communist states, and I say that as a leftist, is the fact that they are taking the words of Marx and Lenin literally, and they're trying to make politics with them.
You can't.
It's a philosophy. It is the idea of equality of all men, of being treated as equal and treating equal.
Neither the USSR, nor the People's Republic Of China, nor the Democratic Republic of Korea, nor the People's Republic of Poland, nor the People's Republic of Hungary etc etc etc have done this or are doing this.
They aren't.
They are trying to stay in power, that's all. During their revolution, things sounded good to the people. Because they claimed to be Communists. They weren't. They were something, but they weren't Communists. A true Communist will know that violence is wrong, that trying to give Communism through war is contradictory.
Salvador Allende was more of a Communist/Socialist than Lenin and Mao together.
And Stalin... he was a military dictator.

Mind you, Communism is a very democratic system. It defends liberty and equality. It wants freedom of speech and the well-being of people. It wants peace.

Hitler wanted nothing of that.

Just because the Americans are radically paranoid against Communism doesn't mean that everything they regard as bad is communistic.
And most of all, it doesn't mean that Communism is bad.

Next time you start trolling, think for yourself once. Please.

Oh, and by the way: Had Hitler had it his way, he would have been allied to Great Britain and at war against the Soviet Union.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom