AntSou
Deity
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2019
- Messages
- 2,831
1000x800 map size for a 4X game should be considered tiny, especially considering the multi-threading capabilities of today's first line personnel computers. Since "Civ VI" should have been titled Civ Revolutions II, I can not justify wasting any more good money on it unless it meets the minimum requirements I stated in my previous post.
This is ridiculous and I can't tell whether you're being sarcastic.
If you're being serious then what you're asking for, ironically, is to not be taken seriously. There's a chasm between being critical of something and just complaining for the sake of it.
Edit: Unless you mean 100x80? I'd still find it unreasonable to consider that tiny, but at least there's something there to work with.
Last edited: