glider1
Deity
Yeah it's wonderful thanks Thal. Totally agree that we don't need to flatten leaders out completely. Generally leaders are more competitive and keen in G&K than they were in the old days of Vanilla.
The controversy will always be with our old friend Monte. What will become of Monte? In my final game of G&K before leaving it and moving onto GEM once and for all, Monte did his typically stupid thing. He roamed a sizable army around the continent attacking remote cities or local enemies and just wasted away his opportunities before getting swallowed up by his neighbor. So if we can get Monte to settle down even just a bit, he might be able to last longer and surprise us all!
Note: the concept of "surprise" means that most if not all leaders should be capable of surprising us in their ability to survive and thrive. That is the irony of flattening out leader personalities. They can still do surprising things according to the opportunities that are available to them.
Cheers
The controversy will always be with our old friend Monte. What will become of Monte? In my final game of G&K before leaving it and moving onto GEM once and for all, Monte did his typically stupid thing. He roamed a sizable army around the continent attacking remote cities or local enemies and just wasted away his opportunities before getting swallowed up by his neighbor. So if we can get Monte to settle down even just a bit, he might be able to last longer and surprise us all!
Note: the concept of "surprise" means that most if not all leaders should be capable of surprising us in their ability to survive and thrive. That is the irony of flattening out leader personalities. They can still do surprising things according to the opportunities that are available to them.
Cheers