Bad comparisons are bad.![]()
I would like to throw CCR into the ring. And then vote for them.
I'd aslo like you all to take a listen to The Tragically Hip. By far the best band to come from Canada (Rush sucks!)
Beatles aren't a rock band...bad thread is bad.
Studio band - Led Zeppelin
Live - Queen
Bad logic is bad too.
Beatles aren't a rock band...bad thread is bad.
I agree. I consider them closer to pop than rock.
That sound pop to you? Sounds very much like Zeppelin to be sure.
Oh, and Wikipedia considers them to be a rock band.
Wow that's...not something I hear everyday.
No, not really. We're talking about comparing on the one hand three musicians that created and developed a style of music practiced and adored by millions of billions of people, while at the same time being highly successful in their own rights as musicians (I'd put Berry on the top 20 rock guitarists list), creating songs that have been covered by nearly every rock band in the 60s and early 70s (and are still covered to this day), and just being all around awesome in their own rights
To on the other hand the guy who invented and codified a sport, albeit a popular one, and then went on to be a mediocre coach sporting a losing record.
apples to oranges much?
THE GREATEST ROCK BAND OF ALL TIME IS OBJECTIVELY EITHER CHUCK BERRY OR BUDDY HOLLY AND THE CRICKETS OR BO DIDDLEY. Since, you know, they basically created Rock Music.
What must be noted is that I am not picking Berry, Holly and Diddley simply because they basically created Rock and Roll as we know it today, but more because while doing that they also damn good rock artists.
I'd say those three artists collectively are covered more often than any other three bands, with the closest three in my mind being in all likelihood Dylan and another two of those three.
TBF, Queen did put on brilliant concerts, and Mercury was a dynamic, electrifying frontman. I personally wouldn't put them up as the best live band of all time (that would be the Who, IMO), but they belong in the discussion.
What you said was:
Leaving aside that this entire debate is subjective, the gist of that is that they created it, so they're the best at it. That's just faulty, faulty logic, and it falls apart when applied to pretty much anything else, which was the point I was making.
FWIW, I'd say those three are up there with anyone in rock, Berry especially.
I'd doubt that. 'Yesterday' for one, is the most covered song around, AFAIK. They're certainly up there though.
I understand, but generally it's Led Zep you see as best live band, and not best studio.
My fault for thinking it was implied. I wouldn't have put them up if they were terrible artists, which, as I said, was exactly why I didn't put Elvis up there. Also I didn't really bother to mention that I was being rather tongue in cheek when I said that (which I tried to convey by the All Caps and the fact that I said it directly after ranting about how selecting a "BEST EVAR" really isn't worth pursuing, and rather we should list off bands by tier instead so things could get just slightly less flamin'). I suppose I could have conveyed this much better by saying something obnoxious like GUNS N ROSES BEST EVAR AMIRITE, but my train of thought got lost in my irritation that some here were just fawning over The Beatles when some equally (if not IMO more deserving) bands were going completely unmentioned.
Meh, I'd put them as the 4th most behind Dylan. This too is probably rather subjective, being that the main reason I like those three so much is the focus of my listening is sixties and early seventies (when everyone and their mother did Who Do You Love or I'm a Man or Not Fade Away), and then the only thing past the early seventies I have, barring Led Zep, Queen, The Clash and the like, are sixties artists' later releases (who really liked covering Dylan). The only Beatles covers I have that I can think of off the top of my head are The Grateful Dead doing Revolution, and The Jerry Garcia Band doing Dear Prudence, so...![]()
Ah, fair enough, my sarcasm detector has been pretty faulty recently. My bad.
Also, I wouldn't call Elvis terrible. Overrated, sure, but he put out some good music.
Link to video.
No, but that does
No one's disputing that the Beatles did Rock Songs. What we're saying is that they are a pop/rock band that tends to fall more on the Pop side of things.
Because Wikipedia is totally the ultimate opinion on everything.![]()
I wonder how Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers got dropped from the list. Seriously, theyve been around for 30-some years.