Harry Potter

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw only movies. I enjoyed them with exception of The Half-Blood Prince - without last 10 minutes it was without any action.

HBP deviated a lot from the books, even by the standard set by the other 5. I don't recall them ever adding their own plot point entirely and altering the storyline like they did.
Spoiler :
They burned down the Burrow. Which btw, why did they just stand there and watch it burn down? THEY ARE ALL WIZARDS! NOT EVEN NEWB WIZARDS! DO SOMETHING INSTEAD OF JUST WATCHING YOUR HOUSE BURN DOWN


Was I the only one who noticed how unsaturated the colors were in this movie? The scene where Harry tears Malfoy a new one in the bathroom was practically in black and white.
 
I consider the last two books to be much worse then the first five. The last two failed to resolve some of the more intriguing and important stuff raised in the first five.

I'm a bit involved in HP fandom and occasionally read some HP fanfic. The fandom, although filled with loonies, may occasionally make the books deeper.
 
My daughter is reading the series so I promised to join her.

I disagree with most of the posters who said the earlier books were better. I found 1 just ok, 2 boring, and 3, 5 and 7 as favorites (6 was a lil too slow)

It's not even literature. If you want good children's literature, read Alice. Harry Potter trains people to read Steven King, not Shakespeare.
Stephen King is a literary genius. I read "the long walk" like 8 times and he wrote that, I believe, in HS or college.
 
The change in authorial voice throughout the series as the children grew up was well done, though tailing off towards the later books as she never had the courage of her convictions to carry it through. Increasingly adult concerns entered the world, but only those concerns that were appropriate.

The first two books were finding their feet and genuinely children's books. The third book had genuine literary merit. After the thirds awards they became increasingly flabby and self-indulgent. Enjoyable and page turners but in need of an editor with the authority over JK to make her axe half the book. Very similar to the superstar director syndrome of producing a curates egg of a three hour movie within which is the body of a truly great 90 minute film screaming to be free.

What she did do outstandingly was to create a coherent world. To paint a character - albeit an archetype - with a couple of words. And a world people wanted to return to. This success contributed to the failure of her overarching project, as the shifting voice could not shift as far as it needed to without destroying the mise en scene that was her USP. 11-12-13 the characters and the voice aged naturally, but then their development arrested. Not to put too finer point on it they discovered the shrieking shack and didnt use it to get drunk and stoned and cop a feel.
Lol, yeah even at 17 seems like Harry never got past 1st base.
 
I caught the first movie in a theater. I was with some college friends, and we were stoned witless, and we thought all the cute little brit kids, strange noises, and magic was just phenomenal. Pure shock and awe.

Years later, I listened to Stephen Fry's audiobook performance of the seven books. Between these two lavish presentations of the franchise, I've never been able to relate with people's complaints about the books.

The last two failed to resolve some of the more intriguing and important stuff raised in the first five.
Can you expand on that?

HBP deviated a lot from the books, even by the standard set by the other 5. I don't recall them ever adding their own plot point entirely and altering the storyline like they did.
Spoiler :
They burned down the Burrow. Which btw, why did they just stand there and watch it burn down? THEY ARE ALL WIZARDS! NOT EVEN NEWB WIZARDS! DO SOMETHING INSTEAD OF JUST WATCHING YOUR HOUSE BURN DOWN
If I had to make a guess, they needed to show very succinctly, and spectacularly since it's a movie, that everything was going down in flames. Books can draw this out with gradual developments, new behaviors in old characters, and many chapters. Movies can't. So it's probably forgivable as far as movies go.

But I can't handle movies after books, for just these sorts of reasons.
 
Last edited:
Moderator Action: Please don't necro 8 year old threads. Make a new thread to discuss Harry Potter if you'd like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom