Hitler or Stalin

[GhostWriter16]

Out of the two, who would you rather have as your leader. Stalin killed 3 times as many people, but only those who disagreed with him and more humanely. Meanwhile, Hitler killed less people and he wasn't a Communist. This is assuming you have to pick, obviously just about anyone else would be better, but assuming you have to pick...

 

[kulade]

Please reexamine your life.

 

[Terxpahseyton]

What makes you think Stalin caused more humanly deaths?

 

[nonconformist]

Obama .

 

[RedRalph]

Stalin didnt kill 3 times as many people. Hitler killed 27m Soviet citizens, start from there and work it out.

 

[useless]

Hitler was a right wing, Christian extremist who used catholicism's anti semetic views and the historical anti semetism it created, to justify and enact the holocaust

 

[ColdClimate]

What, no Mao option?

Too close to home, Chairman...?

 

[SS-18 ICBM]

I'm apolitical, and Stalin would leave me alone.

 

[Munch]

Based on Nazi human experimentation alone, I pick Stalin.

 

[warpus]

Meanwhile, Hitler killed less people and he wasn't a Communist.

Being a nazi is so much better than being communist?

 

[JohnRM]

If I was reborn into the world, tomorrow, under the rule of either leader...

Stalin. Unless I was born healthy and white, I was screwed under Hitler. All I had to do with Stalin is not be remarkable and not piss him off.

 

[Cheezy the Wiz]

I would pick the medium between the two: Poland.

 

[Leoreth]

Except if you were born into a region that is struck by deliberate famine.

Being a nazi is so much better than being communist?

I thought Dominion made it entirely clear by now that being a communist is merely one level above the Antichrist and all Apocalyptic Riders combined on his scale. Or only half a level, I'm still not sure.

It maybe depends on if Obama really is the Antichrist, which he doesn't seem to be but there's still a possibility somehow, or anything like that

 

[useless]

I would pick the medium between the two: Poland.

Oh no you didn't!

 

[ParadigmShifter]

Stalin.

Who has killed more though - Hitler, Stalin or the God of the Old Testament?

 

[Leoreth]

Compared to available human population?

 

[nonconformist]

On a purely pragmatic scale, Nazi Germany was more liberal than Stalin's USSR, and would probably offer a higher survival rate to most non-Jews.

 

[GhostWriter16]

Except if you were born into a region that is struck by deliberate famine.


I thought Dominion made it entirely clear by now that being a communist is merely one level above the Antichrist and all Apocalyptic Riders combined on his scale. Or only half a level, I'm still not sure.

It maybe depends on if Obama really is the Antichrist, which he doesn't seem to be but there's still a possibility somehow, or anything like that

Well, any world leader could be the antichrist. As the POTUS, Obama could potentially start a new world order if he wanted to (Apparently he actually said something about a new world order, though I won't judge what he meant.)

I'm pretty sure he's not the antichrist. But with as poor political views as he has, I'll be watching him.

What, no Mao option?

Too close to home, Chairman...?

Please stop. I hope you're joking

Hitler was a right wing, Christian extremist who used catholicism's anti semetic views and the historical anti semetism it created, to justify and enact the holocaust

Hitler wasn't a real Christian though.

Stalin didnt kill 3 times as many people. Hitler killed 27m Soviet citizens, start from there and work it out.

Ok, I mean his own people. Hitler killed 6 million of his own, Stalin killed 20 million. However, if you kill people for disagreeing with you, its at least a smart way to set up a dictatorship. Hitler was just a madman.

I pick Stalin.

 

[SS-18 ICBM]

Hitler killed 6 million of his own, Stalin killed 20 million.

Probably need to consider the percentages.

 

[ParadigmShifter]

So, in other words, "Yay Communism!"?