Stuck_as_a_Mac
Aptenodytes forsteri
zarn- im on it, but first lemme install windows.
also- its in the cartographic office, right?
also- its in the cartographic office, right?
Originally posted by donsig
I'm in favor of static provinces as that will allow each to develope their own identity and history. Shuffling cities from province to province will only give us schizofrenic provinces and governors.
I do think we need more governors/senators though. (Because I need a job.) I'm leaning towards variant A if we can manage to make three or four provinces around the capital city that would be fairly equal production/corruption-wise.
Originally posted by Grandmaster
SaaM, I'm liking this latest proposal. The only thing I disagree with is dividing the Aztecs into two provinces. I'm assuming that hald-uncovered city on the map is Aztec, and I would suggest that at least initially we keep the Aztecs as one province.
Originally posted by disorganizer
If we leave out the borders on the edged of the provinces (open norhtern border of bohemia for example) i would like that one best.
we only need to define the borders near our civ at the momen imho.