How much wealth would you accumulate before giving the rest to charity?

I bet that's clever, but I haven't a clue what it means.

The nearest I get to it is "bainal-tarj". But so what?
 
Behold I do not give lectures or a little charity, When I give I give myself.

-Walt Whitman

I hope little idealism will not hurt...
 
Aren't you feeling just a little greedy for not giving more or earlier though?

Has any one felt greedy? Greed to me is a judgment call about how we feel another person is greedy. See below.

Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms: greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge, has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA.

USA #1

I am shocked that a lawyer cannot find a better word!! Your follow up post did little to come up with a better word also. How do we even know when a person feels greedy? Maybe you could enlighten us on how that feels?

Spoiler :
Just today I gave up on a career that may have put me in that position. There is something inside of me that just would not let me get to that point. I by no means feel greedy for even pursuing such a career, unless that is what deep inside of me was saying. I may never know the answer to the question put forward. Survival is not greed. Survival is the coping mechanism of life. Greed is not sitting on a pile of money either. Greed, IMO is the opposite of blessing. The reason why in the past the USA was #1, is we were known as a country of people who "blessed" others. From what, I have heard, greedy people die in fear and emptiness, but it was those who freely used their money to forward the economy that truly allowed the US to climb to the top. BTW, I am not in favor of trickle down either. I think that it should flow down without government involvement. You probably forgot to mention on purpose that some of those millions ended up in elected officials coffers?

I suppose that the closest thing to greed, is the unwillingness to share even what we do have. So even someone who is barely getting by would be greedy if they felt compelled to give someone a helping hand, if it was in their power to do so, and refused to do so. It would not matter how much money you had or did not have, in that case.


tl, dr IMO, holding back doing what one feels they should do, is greed.
 
Money is not the prime asset in life. Time is.

One can be greedy with time also, but how can being greedy with it further anything? Giving your time away is also a blessing.
 
I could make £1 million last the rest of my life if I were careful, £2 million would make it very comfortable. I might like 4 or 5 just so I could go a little crazy, but any more than that I'd never use anyway. I'd probably like to share most of it out amongst friends and family before charity though.
 
Money is not the prime asset in life. Time is.

Very true.

The question is not "When do you start giving to charity?", but "At what point do you have enough wealth that you feel that instead of increasing your wealth further, you just share the rest to some starving child or similar?"

I'm just curious to see if there's some threshold where the unshared wealth is seen as morally wrong. Where is that threshold for you, at today's dollar value?

Never.

I'll rather invest my time in fighting against the need/usefulness for any "charities" than in amassing great wealth. Because amassing personal wealth is part and parcel of the process which creates the very "market" that then justifies those charities.
 
Disclaimer: After I graduate and have repaid my student loans.

Forecast:

Core Living Expenses plus Discretionary Budget: $700/mo. (Grocery, Electricity, etc.)
Investments in Retirement Accounts & Other: $500/mo. (Retirement savings)
Vacation & High-Cost Items Budget: $800/mo. (Vacations, if [car payments], etc.)


Known Charitable Expenditures:
--------------------------------------
JohnRM's College Grant 1: $3,000/yr (2 x $1,500) if (gross income < 55,000/yr)
JohnRM's College Grant 2: $3,000/yr (2 x $1,500) if (gross income > 55,000/yr)
Two foster children: $3,600/yr ($1,800 ea.)
Community Hands Project: $500/yr.
Religion-based Expenses: $500/yr.
Thanksgiving dinner for 200: $1,000/yr.
Christmas dinner for 200: $1,000/yr.
--------------------------------------
Total: $9,600-12,600 in dedicated expenditures


It would appear that I'd spend about $24,000 per year and donate whatever I earn over the top. I may require a truck within the near future, so my cost of living may increase slightly. With an earnings projection of about $34,500 after taxes, total charitable expenditures should be equal to roughly...

30% of my net income ($34,000) at $50,000/yr Gross -- Low-end income projection
38% of my net income ($40,000) at $60,000/yr Gross -- High-end income projection
Note: I could earn more, but I'd rather just work less.



If we're talking lump sum...say I won the lottery for 200 million dollars. I would keep about $5 million to myself and give away the rest.
 
$40billion. But I would give almost all the remaining to charity when I died.

No wonder you support progressive taxation:mischief:

Seriously though, 40 billion? Is there any particular use you would have for that much? I was deliberately shooting on the high end for ONE billion (Admittedly, I did leave funding open for funding a Presidential candidate.)
 
No wonder you support progressive taxation:mischief:

Seriously though, 40 billion? Is there any particular use you would have for that much? I was deliberately shooting on the high end for ONE billion (Admittedly, I did leave funding open for funding a Presidential candidate.)


Political attack ads.
 
Political attack ads.

That's kind of funny actually since we were both thinking along the lines of "Massive amounts of money to manipulate the political process" (One thing we'll probably agree on, I'd certainly use it to minimize the effect of big money later on.) Although I was thinking along the lines of "Get a libertarian elected" and you were thinking "Attack the Republicans:mischief:"
 
$40billion wouldn't get a libertarian elected. Money can only overcome dumbassery so far.
 
$40billion wouldn't get a libertarian elected. Money can only overcome dumbassery so far.

If they could get this close to getting Mitt Romney elected, do you REALLY think it would be that hard to get Gary Johnson elected?:mischief:

Seriously though, I find your revulsion to libertarians odd, sure we disagree with you on economic issues, but the Republicans disagree with you on just about everything and yet you don't seem to hate them as much.
 
If they could get this close to getting Mitt Romney elected, do you REALLY think it would be that hard to get Gary Johnson elected?:mischief:

Seriously though, I find your revulsion to libertarians odd, sure we disagree with you on economic issues, but the Republicans disagree with you on just about everything and yet you don't seem to hate them as much.


It's not really revulsion. I'm not disgusted by them. I simply have no real respect for them because they have a completely ridiculous world view.
 
It's not really revulsion. I'm not disgusted by them. I simply have no real respect for them because they have a completely ridiculous world view.

A Libertarian could actually work with a Democratic congress (Or a Republican congress) which might actually put an end to the gridlock. Unlike the Republicans, the Libertarians will not stubbornly keep nationbuilding and pursuing the war on drugs.

Of course, we'd also cut taxes and regulations which I know you obviously wouldn't agree with.

Gary did fairly well in New Mexico.
 
I need about $10 million to create an easily sustainable lifestyle. $5 million to buy off the rest of my family.

After that, I don't know if I'd give the rest to charity per say (though 10% of my 'sustainable lifestyle) would go to the desperate poor. However, I'd fund higher risk, higher reward scientific and industrial development programs.
 
Only Cutlass is getting into the proper figures here. Seemingly this thread has a lot of posters who want change, £10m? thats not enough.

I'm going for £100 billion but at my death my family would get a significant portion and a few billion to some charities.
 
Back
Top Bottom