How To Stamp Out Cultural Marxism In A Single Generation

[GoodEnoughForMe]

So this thread for 7 pages has been that SCOTUS actually did not uphold the constitution when they disagreed with a view of the constitution that the majority didn't share?

 

[civman110]

So this thread for 7 pages has been that SCOTUS actually did not uphold the constitution when they disagreed with a view of the constitution that the majority didn't share?

So you have no problem with unelected, appointed supreme court justices bypassing all other branches of government and elected officials to write law by judicial decree?

That sounds like authoritarianism to me.

Gee, I wonder in the future if the same method will be used against the left to write law by judicial fiat. The political tide sure isn't moving in favour of the left. They won't be in power much longer. If you ask me it seems like the left set a really bad precedent that's going to turn around and bite them, but they're too daft to see it.

 

[JollyRoger]

I support the culture and values as they are. That's why I'm not out and about fighting for whatever imagined faux cause with the SJWs. It's the SJWs that want to change things, but it's not going to happen. The political tide has already turned against them and it's only going to accelerate now.

The SJWs gave it all they had and they lost. They just can't see it yet.

So you have no problem with unelected, appointed supreme court justices bypassing all other branches of government and elected officials to write law by judicial decree?

That sounds like authoritarianism to me.

Gee, I wonder in the future if the same method will be used against the left to write law by judicial fiat. The political tide sure isn't moving in favour of the left. They won't be in power much longer. If you ask me it seems like the left set a really bad precedent that's going to turn around and bite them, but they're too daft to see it.

Given that you reject the way our system has worked for over 200 years, are you confessing to being a SJW?

 

[civman110]

Given that you reject the way our system has worked for over 200 years, are you confessing to being a SJW?

Except that isn't how the judicial branch has functioned during the last 200 years. This kind of behaviour has only existed within the last 10 years or so.

It's very undemocratic.

 

[JollyRoger]

Are you familiar with Marbury v. Madison?

 

[Hygro]

The political tide sure isn't moving in favour of the left. They won't be in power much longer. If you ask me it seems like the left set a really bad precedent that's going to turn around and bite them, but they're too daft to see it.

You can talk tides all you want but at this point mainstream pro-social justice progressivism isn't a "tide", it's the ocean.

 

[Berzerker]

So you have no problem with unelected, appointed supreme court justices bypassing all other branches of government and elected officials to write law by judicial decree?

That sounds like authoritarianism to me.

They knocked down a law that denied marital status to our fellow citizens. That would be anti-authoritarianism... Would you defend slavery 200 years ago if it was a judge who ruled it unconstitutional? Which of those two - slavery or abolition by judicial decree - would you define as authoritarian?

Gee, I wonder in the future if the same method will be used against the left to write law by judicial fiat.

I sure hope so, I dont want the left making my decisions for me either

 

[Arwon]

The 14th amendment is unconstitutional!

 

[Berzerker]

I dont think it was properly ratified

 

[civman110]

They knocked down a law that denied marital status to our fellow citizens. That would be anti-authoritarianism... Would you defend slavery 200 years ago if it was a judge who ruled it unconstitutional?

Slavery was not struck down in this manner. The Constitution was amended to abolish slavery, which required the support of all the States and other branches of government.

You can talk tides all you want but at this point mainstream pro-social justice progressivism isn't a "tide", it's the ocean.

Sure doesn't appear so. SJWs are openly mocked in most places.

 

[Cheezy the Wiz]

I'm willing to bet that "most places" you frequent also mock foreign accents and women in pants.

 

[useless]

You know full well that SJW doesn't just mean "people who believe in social justice". It's a disparaging term for those who use the concept of social justice as a smoke screen for their own bigotry towards races, genders, and/or sexual orientations that they don't like. #killallmen #cisscum

Cis, White Straight men are the true victims of the world, look at all the discrimination they face such as:

*Farts*


Also why would black people vote anything other than the Democratic party, when the Republican party is based upon dogwhistle attacks against any and all non-whites?

It's good to see SJW's prevailing, with regressives on the backfoot, maybe we can finally get some decent social change, provided we shame those with racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic etc, opinions enough.

Like others have said, this thread is a good indicator of those who feel threatened and are trying to pushback against any and all forms of attack against their priviledge.

 

[abradley]

{Snip}

Not really, the argument really rests on the state of Black neighborhoods today after generations of voting 90% for Dems.

 

[useless]

Again i point out, why would black people vote for a party that openly despises them, such as the Republicans?

 

[Berzerker]

Slavery was not struck down in this manner. The Constitution was amended to abolish slavery, which required the support of all the States and other branches of government.

Amending the Constitution doesn't require other branches of government or all the states, but you didn't answer my question. If you were alive 200 years ago would you defend slavery as anti-authoritarian if a judge ruled it unconstitutional?

 

[Timsup2nothin]

Not really, the argument really rests on the state of Black neighborhoods today after generations of voting 90% for Dems.

Said the guy who wouldn't go in a black neighborhood without rolling up the windows, locking the doors, and putting the pedal to the metal. I'd bet my bottom dollar you have not the first clue about anything about a black neighborhood.

Moderator Action: Flaming, personal attack.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[civman110]

Amending the Constitution doesn't require other branches of government or all the states

It absolutely does.

 

[Hygro]

Not really, the argument really rests on the state of Black neighborhoods today after generations of voting 90% for Dems.

That's the same argument.

 

[Timsup2nothin]

Amending the Constitution doesn't require other branches of government or all the states

It absolutely does.

Because...because...because....CIVMAN SAYS SO!!!

 

[Hygro]

Sure doesn't appear so. SJWs are openly mocked in most places.

You don't ever hang out with young people?