Magma_Dragoon
Reploid
- Joined
- May 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,354
I don't see how the US could be above Britain. Britain has alot more historicals in which to be significant, and its historicals led to USA's existence.
That's true - for instance they have a totally different language; and although some words almost look like English they have a completely different meaning!
Happy Christmas to my cousins across the pond!![]()
At first I thought he had the US too high as well, but the last 100 years of civilization have been more important than the previous 2000. The US put someone on the moon, landed a robot on Mars and invented the nuclear bomb. The US has roughly twice the GDP as the next highest nation, China, and has a far better military.
I think you have Mongolia too low though. In the 1200 it's estimated that there were 360 million people. The mongols killed 40 million and raped and impregnated many more. They took over both China and Russia, severely crippled the Arabians and were oh so close to conquering all of Europe. They had just decimated the Hungarian army and were on a mission to conquer everything to the Atlantic Ocean when Genghis Khan died. If he hadn't they would have. That let Europe get ahead of the Muslims and China at a time they were probably third.
They had just decimated the Hungarian army and were on a mission to conquer everything to the Atlantic Ocean when Genghis Khan died.
You had me checking through every civ until I realized you had Poland and Morocco both as 35.![]()
If you count Turkey as the Byzantine Empire they need to be ranked higher.
Turkish people can't complain about their country not being in the game, both Byzantium as The Ottoman Empire were Turkish
Truly, Anatolia was the first "great melting pot", beginning earlier than that with Hattians, Hittites, Mycenaeans (Pelasgians?), and whatever Semitic-speaking ethnicities were migrating north (Amoritic? Aramaic?). So it was indo-european (what would become Germanic, Celt), "Greek", and "Arabic" before or certainly "by" 1800bc.
At first I thought he had the US too high as well, but the last 100 years of civilization have been more important than the previous 2000.
Some of the comments here are kind of offensive.
Korea as the <snip> of China and Japan is horribly inaccurate. Korea actually influenced Japan during its early days. China never conquered Korea, perhaps had it as a vassal, but not outright conquered it. Japan only managed to rule Korea relatively recently and not for long. Gangnam style is not the only thing Korea contributed to history. Just saying, and I'm not Korean.