As someone who has wanted Italy for years, it would be a shame if we don't get it now that civ switching is a thing that makes it more likely. Having a line of Romans>Florence/Tuscany>Italy would be the dream.Does a Modern Italy make that much sense? Post 1700 has hardly been the Italian peninsula's glory days, and while post unified Italy was more important geo-politically than Spain, it never reached the state of the great powers - even with Mussolini and WW2. And I don't think anyone really wants Italy represented as a fascist Civ. Garibaldi Italy would be a possibility, but a bit lack lustre IMO, and would struggle to make my top 5 (or even top 10) just in Europe for the modern era tbh. Stretching the eras timelines to breaking point might allow a renaissance Florentine Italy - but that flourished simultaneously with Spain (or even slightly earlier), so the transition from Spain to Italy would make no sense here.
I do understand the sentiments of how boring it would if only based off of modern Italy, but as you mentioned Garibaldi Italy could work. He could also be tied to Modern South American civs as well.
