If you read Wikipedia, you are a paedophile

[Mise]

Like undeveloped? No tits or hips? a kids body? Then you probably have paedophilic inclinnations. The attraction is not to a date on the girls passport, its to her body (a girl you are just looking at)

Goodo, that's what I figured. I guess paedophiles should just go after girls who look 13 but are actually 18. That way, no children get abused. Afterall, the real crime of paedophilia is to the children -- NOT the thought-crime of being attracted to no-tits-no-hips bodies.

I guess it's more difficult for paedophiles who are attracted to boys though.

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

No, put it back

Nope, you just conquered the past part of the thread. Not the whole she-bang.

I'll put that back

 

[RedRalph]

Goodo, that's what I figured. I guess paedophiles should just go after girls who look 13 but are actually 18. That way, no children get abused. Afterall, the real crime of paedophilia is to the children -- NOT the thought-crime of being attracted to no-tits-no-hips bodies.

I guess it's more difficult for paedophiles who are attracted to boys though.

I never once talked about acting on intent - merely the motivation of your attraction. Regardless of how well physically developed a 13 year old girl is shes not ready for sex IMO. but to assess the mindset of the guy looking at her, I think my standards are a fairly good gauge.

 

[Ecofarm]

If they are looking at a 13 year old with wide hips who looks 18 and they have no idea what age she is? Yeah, I do

That's not what I asked.

I asked:

If someone is aiming for 13 year olds (as the prefered target age), do you think they are looking for hips?

 

[Bugfatty300]

What if she's 18 but looks like she's 13? This is a genuine question, btw - I wanna know what you guys think. IMO, if you fancy her because she looks 13, that makes you at least a little bit perverted. But of course it isn't illegal or anything.

I agree that is pedo-esque since that person would actively be seeking child-like feature. And yeah there are lots of sights and porn studios that offer 18 year olds who look VERY young. By the same logic that is being used to ban things like Bart and Lisa porn you'd also have to ban these as well. Which means you're telling grown adults (the 18-19 year old models) that taking pictures of themselves is considered child porn because they look young.

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

Eco, do you believe a paedophile gets his kicks by looking at birth dates?

 

[RedRalph]

That's not what I asked.

I asked:

If someone is aiming for 13 year olds (as the prefered target), do you think they are looking for hips?

no, almost certaintly not

 

[Bugfatty300]

Are you telling me that some people like females that look like adults, but are not?

Yes I am. How very astute of you.

That's absurd. Nobody is like "well, you look like an adult... that's good... but I'm gonna need to see ID proving that you are under 15"

What's absurd? That a grown man can find a well-developed 13 year old attractive? I don't understand.

 

[Ecofarm]

Eco, do you believe a paedophile gets his kicks by looking at birth dates?

Of course not.

That's why I made the point of how absurd it would be for someone to be attracted to females who looked 18 but were younger. That's ridiculous.

Although there is an element to pedophilia that is social. They are scared of actual women and seek to dominate basically idiots.

Yes I am. How very astute of you.



What's absurd? That a grown man can find a well-developed 13 year old attractive? I don't understand.

You misunderstand what I was saying.

I was saying that noone prefers females who look like adults BUT ARE NOT.

And by the way, I could not find a "well-developed" 13 year old attractive, because it is not just physical for me. She needs to be able to hold her own in a conversation.

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

That's why I made the point of how absurd it would be for someone to be attracted to females who looked 18 but were younger. That's ridiculous.

You are overcomplicating this.

I'll simplify it by removing one condition: someone to be attracted to females who looked 18. And add another: But who happen to be 13.

So imagine healthy non-pervert bloke. 20 years old, being attracted to a girl which he thinks is 18. Turns out she's 13.

 

[Mise]

EDIT: Ziggy said it better than I did...

 

[Ecofarm]

You are overcomplicating this.

No, you overcomplicated this. I was refering to people who target 13 year olds.

Your response of "but she might look 18" was irrelevant. The only way it made sense was if someone targeted adult looking females who were, in fact, younger.

And again:

I could not be attracted to a 13 year old who (supposedly) looks 18. I'm not attracted to 18 year olds. A woman needs to be at least in her mid-20s for me, preferably mid-40s. I'm 37. It is more than physical for me; that's called being an adult.

 

[El_Machinae]

What were you attracted to when you were 13?

 

[Bugfatty300]

I was saying that noone prefers females who look like adults BUT ARE NOT.

In general they (men) prefer females they find attractive which could be 13 to 40 depending on the female. Age isn't important. Attractiveness is. That is the point I'm making. You're driving this completely down a completely different road. And yes I'm quite aware of the legal, moral, ethical, negative consequences of underage sex.

 

[Ecofarm]

What were you attracted to when you were 13?

Older chicks, not younger ones.

In general they prefer females they find attractive which could be 13 to 40 depending on the female. Age isn't important. Attractiveness is. That is the point I'm making. You're driving this completely down a completely different road.

No, you and others are. By spamming "13 could look 18" as if noone has ever heard that before.

Besides, even if a 13 year old has hips THEY ARE A FREAKING IDIOT. They don't know anything about the world. They have no idea of consequences, implications or repercussions. It is child abuse.

 

[El_Machinae]

Older chicks, not younger ones.

My point is that it's quite natural to be sexually attracted to a developed 13 year old. At least, that's the way I remember junior high.

But it's quite another thing to be attracted to an undeveloped child.

 

[Ecofarm]

My point is that it's quite natural to be sexually attracted to a developed 13 year old. At least, that's the way I remember junior high.

But it's quite another thing to be attracted to an undeveloped child.

You don't think it is a little screwed up to be attracted to someone who doesn't know their ass from their elbow (and has no ability to support themselves at all, and hasn't taken algebra) AS AN ADULT?

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

No, you overcomplicated this. I was refering to people who target 13 year olds.

Your response of "but she might look 18" was irrelevant. The only way it made sense was if someone targeted adult looking females who were, in fact, younger.

You might want to check the flow of the discussion, since I think there's been a little confusion here.

 

[Ecofarm]

Ya think so?

There was no confusion on my part. You guys diverting into "but she could be younger than she looks" had nothing to do with what I was talking about.

 

[Turner]

Moderator Action: Thread closed pending cleanup.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889