Imperial Or Metric?

Imperial or Metric, which is better?

  • Imperial, make mine a pint!

    Votes: 35 18.8%
  • Metric. 'we don't want any Imperial entanglements'...

    Votes: 151 81.2%

  • Total voters
    186
You can't be too lazy to learn metric. Any idiot can learn metric.

The only thing I really do like about metric is that g is very close to 10 with it, so it makes approximations very easy.
 
Fetus4188 said:
You can't be too lazy to learn metric. Any idiot can learn metric.

Learning isn't the issue. The issue is what you do with what you've learned. ;)
 
MCdread said:
Learning isn't the issue. The issue is what you do with what you've learned. ;)
Indeed, what is hard is not to understand how it work, but actually being able to think in the system.

You can know perfectly that 1 mile is 1.6 km... and you can know there are 400 km between Paris and Lyon, but that doesn't mean you'll know directly the distance in miles between Paris and Lyon. You'll have to calculate it, making the system uncomfortable and not easy to use.

That's the whole reason why it needs at least one generation to switch from the medieval system to the metric system. For instance, the grand parents of my mother (from her father's side) thought in the medieval system... and they were in France (Burgundy), a country which has switched to the metric system at the French Revolution in the 1790's (!!).
 
That's a stupid condition to use, all that means is saying that the system you grew up with is better because that's what you learned everything in. Just like I can say english is the best language because that's the language I think in. I can think of distance in miles and not km. Doesn't that make imperial better? I also can think of distance in meters because I run track so I am used to 100m intervals. Does that make metric better? Again I can think of things in feet because I long jump and have had much experience guessing distance in feet and inches. That doesn't make imperial better. The same can be said for volume, temperature, force, whatever. Neither system is better than the other, it's just what you grow up with.
 
Metric is the way to go. As it is though, I have to use imperial at work, and there is one area where I actually prefer working with imperial than with metric - measuring small objects. I prefer using Mils (1/1000 of an inch) to millimeters, because you can measure very small dimentions, and yet you don't need to resort to decimal places.
 
Fetus4188 said:
That's a stupid condition to use, all that means is saying that the system you grew up with is better because that's what you learned everything in. Just like I can say english is the best language because that's the language I think in. I can think of distance in miles and not km. Doesn't that make imperial better? I also can think of distance in meters because I run track so I am used to 100m intervals. Does that make metric better? Again I can think of things in feet because I long jump and have had much experience guessing distance in feet and inches. That doesn't make imperial better. The same can be said for volume, temperature, force, whatever. Neither system is better than the other, it's just what you grow up with.

Objectively speaking - metric is far more logical, and in that sense it's much better...
 
Logical? That's just a ridiculous statement.
 
Fetus4188 said:
Neither system is better than the other, it's just what you grow up with.
That's just not correct. When dealing with scientific phenomena imperial units are a big headache. The conversian calculations need are much simpler in metric. I grew up with imperial, I learned to love metric.
 
Fetus4188 said:
Logical? That's just a ridiculous statement.

Quick - How many inches in a mile?
ANS: ?????????????????

How many cm in a kilometer?
ANS: 1,000,000
 
Quick - Why do you convert cm to km or inches to miles?
 
Fetus4188 said:
Quick - Why do you convert cm to km or inches to miles?

As an engineer, I could give you 1000s of reasons. For example, let's say a wheel on your stepper motor makes a complete turn every 1cm, and you want to see how many times it will turn over 2.8km distance? You can do it in your head... Or you want to see how many 10cm tiles you will need to fill up 100m sidewalk... There is a reason why nature gave us 10 fingers, and why we have 10 digits and not 12. Decimal system owns imperial.
 
LordRahl said:
Metric is the way to go. As it is though, I have to use imperial at work, and there is one area where I actually prefer working with imperial than with metric - measuring small objects. I prefer using Mils (1/1000 of an inch) to millimeters, because you can measure very small dimentions, and yet you don't need to resort to decimal places.
There are small units than millimeters in the metric system...

1 millimeter (mm) = 1,000 micrometers (µm)
1 micrometer (µm) = 1,000 nanometers (nm)

I think there are even smaller units but I don't know them.
 
LordRahl said:
How many cm in a kilometer?
ANS: 1,000,000
Ummm, 100,000 ;)

Marla_Singer said:
micrometers (µm)
Noone calls them micrometers! They're microns, dammit. :p
 
Marla_Singer said:
There are small units than millimeters in the metric system...

1 millimeter (mm) = 1,000 micrometers (µm)
1 micrometer (µm) = 1,000 nanometers (nm)

I think there are even smaller units but I don't know them.

nanometers, picometers, femtometers...

The reason I prefer mils is because they are just right for the dimentions I deal with every day - as micrometers are too fine, and milimeters are way to big...
 
LordRahl said:
There is a reason why nature gave us 10 fingers, and why we have 10 digits and not 12. Decimal system owns imperial.

The advantages of metric over imperial have nothing to do with the decimal system. It would have the same advantage if our number system was binary, hex, base 12 or anything else.
 
Perfection said:
Noone calls them micrometers! They're microns, dammit. :p
Sorry, we also called them microns in French, but as I wasn't sure of the English translation I've checked in a dictionnary and they were saying micrometers. ;)

My fault. :blush:
 
Marla_Singer said:
Sorry, we also called them microns in French, but as I wasn't sure of the English translation I've checked in a dictionnary and they were saying micrometers. ;)

My fault. :blush:
Eh, it's nothin' I just like smartin off

Of course god units pwn imperial and metric
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units
 
Borrowed with liberty from the noble and rational pioneers of the metric system:

Ah! ça ira, ça ira, ça ira,
Les impérialistes à la lanterne!
Ah! ça ira, ça ira, ça ira,
Ces qui disent <<pousses>> et <<pieds>>, on les pendra!
Le despotisme expirera,
La rationalisme triomphera,
Ah!
 
Back
Top Bottom