Imperium Offtopicum

[TheLastOne36]

The treaty i meant.

 

[Mad Man]

I apologise; allow me to clarify.

There are players(those with countries) and non-players(observers and those without countries). To be eligible to dice roll, you need to be a non-player. Anybody in mind?

So someone not playing right now, OK maybe Yared

 

[sophie]

I apologise; allow me to clarify.

There are players(those with countries) and non-players(observers and those without countries). To be eligible to diceroll, you need to be a non-player. Anybody in mind?

I still think it would be better if it was done by a neutral third party nation who has no vested interest in the outcome (For example, me). Finding a roller would be easier, as would their stance on it (a non-player may prefer one nation to another).

 

[GenMarshall]

Welcome to the game, CivG! I was wondering when you would show up. For a moment I thought California was leaderless.

OOC: I had a bit of a rage meltdown moment after one nation said "OMG YOU HAVE TEH ENERGY WEPONS REMOVE EM NAUGH!!" considering that the type of weapon and technologies don't even factor into dice rolls.

 

[Tani Coyote]

The treaty i meant.

Ah, figured so. Consider the three-way pact officially inked!

So someone not playing right now, OK maybe Yared

Sounds good!

I still think it would be better if it was done by a neutral third party nation who has no vested interest in the outcome (For example, me). Finding a roller would be easier, as would their stance on it (a non-player may prefer one nation to another).

Hmm. I think it's long overdue, so we'll have a UN vote on this. I'll list my proposal for combat systems, and everyone else can then put in their input/suggested modifications.

OOC: I had a bit of a rage meltdown moment after one nation said "OMG YOU HAVE TEH ENERGY WEPONS REMOVE EM NAUGH!!" considering that the type of weapon and technologies don't even factor into dice rolls.

I saw.

Of course it's mostly a matter of numbers and not tech... as we are a Civilization forum, it would be blasphemous to not allow !

 

[Mathalamus]

OOC: I had a bit of a rage meltdown moment after one nation said "OMG YOU HAVE TEH ENERGY WEPONS REMOVE EM NAUGH!!" considering that the type of weapon and technologies don't even factor into dice rolls.

Ive said ti before and ill say it again it DOES factor into it! a spear man shouldn't win against a tank for example.

TLO: i am sorry but you simply do not have enough resources to maintain a navy bigger than mine, unless i missed a large oil deposit, and a large metal deposit, and a good port for training and building. all in all, i think i have a legitimate claim to the largest navy in the world.

sorry. Byzantium hates being inferior. and so do i honestly... ho hard feelings?

in other news, 20 Byzantine Divisions have arrived in Brisbane to Defend the Capital.

 

[GenMarshall]

I saw.

OOC: Yeah, I was nearly ->| |<- this close on pulling a ragequit similar to the one in the DYOS.

 

[TheLastOne36]

I am sure you are underestimating our naval capabilities.

 

[Mathalamus]

I am sure you are underestimating our naval capabilities.

maybe but i still hate to be inferior.

 

[GenMarshall]

maybe but i still hate to be inferior.

Most everyone would agree, that they don't want to be inferior. So you're not alone . Even Perfection does not want to be inferior.

 

[Tani Coyote]

OOC: Yeah, I was nearly ->| |<- this close on pulling a ragequit similar to the one in the DYOS.

Yikes! Hopefully we can prevent that from happening here...

Let's hope the Court rules in favor of advanced weaponry... I want bio-enhanced soldiers!

...Not that it matters anyway, considering, again, this game has a likelihood of spearman vs. tank occurring.

maybe but i still hate to be inferior.

Even a superpower like OTL the USSR or USA has weaknesses. It's impossible to be omnipotent; there is going to be some area where you can get decimated by an opponent. Just how warfare is.

 

[GenMarshall]

...Not that it matters anyway, considering, again, this game has a likelihood of spearman vs. tank occurring.

Or a power armored solder going down in one shot from a dart gun (critical sneak attack) in Fallout 3. Or being headshotted by a freaking sniper 100 yards away and you just came out of spawn in Team Fortress 2.

Even a superpower like OTL the USSR or USA has weaknesses. It's impossible to be omnipotent; there is going to be some area where you can get decimated by an opponent. Just how warfare is.

Heck, even Perfection has a weakness, The Moderators! .

 

[Mathalamus]

Yikes! Hopefully we can prevent that from happening here...

Let's hope the Court rules in favor of advanced weaponry... I want bio-enhanced soldiers!

...Not that it matters anyway, considering, again, this game has a likelihood of spearman vs. tank occurring.



Even a superpower like OTL the USSR or USA has weaknesses. It's impossible to be omnipotent; there is going to be some area where you can get decimated by an opponent. Just how warfare is.

the USA has a huge navy dispite not having any colonies. they do that to police the world. my navy shares that funtiom with the USA of our world

if court rules in favor of advanced technology, then i can contact the Byzantine Star Republic and have them lend a star destroyer. i can destroy any state virually unopposed. or i can create Hoverships (hovering star destroyers) or i can create colony ships, etc.

 

[Perfection]

the USA has a huge navy dispite not having any colonies. they do that to police the world. my navy shares that funtiom with the USA of our world

if court rules in favor of advanced technology, then i can contact the Byzantine Star Republic and have them lend a star destroyer. i can destroy any state virually unopposed. or i can create Hoverships (hovering star destroyers) or i can create colony ships, etc.

Yeah, we'll I'll take your hoverships and beat them into a scrap with my almighty

WOODEN STICK

​

 

[Mathalamus]

the hover ships are air based. you need to but the stink into somethign explosive. itll just bounce off and the captian will kill himself laughing.

 

[sophie]

the USA has a huge navy dispite not having any colonies. they do that to police the world. my navy shares that funtiom with the USA of our world

if court rules in favor of advanced technology, then i can contact the Byzantine Star Republic and have them lend a star destroyer. i can destroy any state virually unopposed. or i can create Hoverships (hovering star destroyers) or i can create colony ships, etc.

The vote is on science fiction weapons so long as they DON'T act as a superweapon similar to a nuke. Your star destroyers would count as that. We don't want the same thing happening to this thread as happened to the last one.

 

[Mathalamus]

then tell me what the limit in technological level is.

 

[Perfection]

the hover ships are air based. you need to but the stink into somethign explosive. itll just bounce off and the captian will kill himself laughing.

DUDE, YOUR SENTENCE IS POORLY PHRASED SO IT'S DIFFICULT FOR ME TO TELL WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

But I will note that the Stick is a very robust piece of driftwood and Pope Perfection can jump really high into the air.

 

[Mathalamus]

DUDE, YOUR SENTENCE IS POORLY PHRASED SO IT'S DIFFICULT FOR ME TO TELL WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

But I will note that the Stick is a very robust piece of driftwood and Pope Perfection can jump really high into the air.

i didnt get high English grades. if you can decipher what im saying its good enough..

and what will you do? whack metal armor with a stick? if it goes down, then im executing my engineers.

 

[choxorn]

Choxorn, how about this?

If you accept, I will support your claims on Ryuku, or Asian mainland.

Alright, deal. But I don't have any claims on Ryuku, I don't want CG to go into rage mode when he doesn't get the Japanese Islands.

@Owen: Only if you agree to sell us the Starbucks Coffee for less than the ridiculous prices they have.