Akka
Moody old mage.
Humans loosing to ants ?
It's perhaps some funny catastrophic scenario to make a movie, but it's simply ridiculous to the extreme.
Even totally naked, there is, as noted, about 200 000 ants for each humans. It's a lot, but the ants only stand a chance if the human is actually totally naked and trying to step on the ants.
Even if the ants were intelligents, they would loose. Of course, if they were intelligents, the casualty level for humans would be simply staggering, because they could infiltrate about any human facility, destroy crop and cattle, and so on. But they would still lose. After a tough fight, but still.
Give each human a firethrower, and see if 200 000 ants, or even ten times as more, are anyhow a match for them.
Add that we can rerout entire rivers to flood an area, effevtively killing 100 % of the ants in the area (and also damaging badly everything in the area, but we're talking about a total war of extermination here, right ?).
The absurdity in the "we would loose to ants" is that it expects ants to fight in a genocidal war, but humans basically fighting while keeping Westerner standard of peace-time and comfortable life... Yeah, sure, if we stay in our houses looking TV and stepping occasionnally on ants, we would lose if they were intelligent.
But in the case of a war of total annihilation, I think we would actually do a bit more than that...
It's perhaps some funny catastrophic scenario to make a movie, but it's simply ridiculous to the extreme.
Even totally naked, there is, as noted, about 200 000 ants for each humans. It's a lot, but the ants only stand a chance if the human is actually totally naked and trying to step on the ants.
Even if the ants were intelligents, they would loose. Of course, if they were intelligents, the casualty level for humans would be simply staggering, because they could infiltrate about any human facility, destroy crop and cattle, and so on. But they would still lose. After a tough fight, but still.
Give each human a firethrower, and see if 200 000 ants, or even ten times as more, are anyhow a match for them.
Add that we can rerout entire rivers to flood an area, effevtively killing 100 % of the ants in the area (and also damaging badly everything in the area, but we're talking about a total war of extermination here, right ?).
The absurdity in the "we would loose to ants" is that it expects ants to fight in a genocidal war, but humans basically fighting while keeping Westerner standard of peace-time and comfortable life... Yeah, sure, if we stay in our houses looking TV and stepping occasionnally on ants, we would lose if they were intelligent.
But in the case of a war of total annihilation, I think we would actually do a bit more than that...