1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

India Total Peaceful Photojournal

Discussion in 'Playthroughs and Photojournals' started by Minh Le, Oct 31, 2018.

  1. YukiN

    YukiN Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2018
    Messages:
    361
    Location:
    Singapore
    Interesting how you chose to use the rivers as defence rather than settling on them. I wonder if this means waterwheel should come earlier in the tech tree.
     
  2. crdvis16

    crdvis16 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    This is correct- at some point, adding more cities with scientist slots will not result in an extra great scientist being born within the time frame of a game.

    Also, even if every new city quickly comes up to speed in population/infrastructure, at some point adding new cities cannot mathematically overcome the tech cost penalty. If the tech cost increase is 7% then I think the soft limit on cities is 14 (and that's assuming the city is instantly producing the average science of all cities right from the turn it is settled). In practice, the actual soft limit is probably much lower, like 9 or 10 I would guess, as it takes a while for a city to get up to speed and dig you out of the hole of settling it.
     
    Bromar1 likes this.
  3. Minh Le

    Minh Le Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    793
    Gender:
    Male
    If I plan to kill Korea early, I will settle on river, but Im planning to just defend myself so definitely no. Settle on river means enemies ranged can shot my city from 2 tiles away and my troops must cross the river to get them, and Hwacha is no joke.
    Assuming each addition city produce average total amount of yield equal to 50% of your capital and increase cost by 7%, we have total cost is 1.07^N, and total yield is 0.5N where N is number of new cities. Solve the equation: 1.07^N=0.5N we have N=46. So the break even point is 46, less than that number any addition city bring benefit :crazyeye:
     
    vyyt likes this.
  4. Tzar Sasha

    Tzar Sasha Tzar of Nowheresville

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    451
    Location:
    The Frozen Tundra
    Total peace? Does that mean game over if another civilization declares war on you? Cause in my book, war is war no matter who started it.
     
  5. Minh Le

    Minh Le Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    793
    Gender:
    Male
    No I cant do that ofc, it just means Im not gonna declare war on anyone (what I do frequently :lol:)
     
  6. Owlbebach

    Owlbebach Warlord

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,727
    Location:
    Moscow
    those 7% are additive, not multiplicative, so it is 1,07 for 2 cities, 1,14 for 3 and 1,21 for 4 cities.
    For both of you - back in time my friend made a formula for that, you can see it here https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/new-version-october-9th-10-9.623188/page-4#post-14887300
    You only need to adjust numbers, it was 10% per city back then, and i believe thanks to this formula people understood that 10% is too much
     
  7. Minh Le

    Minh Le Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    793
    Gender:
    Male
    Wow its too complicated. Im not that good at math. I guess Im gonna play the way I feel right then :D
     
    Erikose likes this.
  8. YukiN

    YukiN Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2018
    Messages:
    361
    Location:
    Singapore
    Additive means there is no real cap from science and culture unless the city is really bad. Multiplicative means each new city needs to be 7% of your current empire's yields, which is a lot more challenging. Do we a source that conclusively states which it is?
     
    crdvis16 likes this.
  9. Owlbebach

    Owlbebach Warlord

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,727
    Location:
    Moscow
    It is additive. For sure. You can easily check it in game
     
    YukiN likes this.
  10. crdvis16

    crdvis16 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    I think that formula is written such that puppets increase tech costs as well? I think that was the case back then but no longer is, right? My understanding is that puppets do NOT increase tech/policy costs (puppet's only drawback is some unhappiness and severely reduced city yields). So I'm not sure that formula is helpful or not.

    Also, my understanding was that every new non-puppet city increases current tech costs by 7% which would be multiplicative in my mind, and which is why you can't go much beyond 10ish non-pupper cities or so on a standard map before you start hindering yourself.

    If it's additive then at 14 non-puppets your next non-puppet would only need to hit ~3% of your total science to be helpful I think.
     
  11. crdvis16

    crdvis16 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    Just did a quick check in-game and it seems to be additive, NOT multiplicative (the rounding of science/culture costs makes the curve a little noisy but it definitely seems to follow the additive curve and not the multiplicative curve). That makes it a bit easier for newly settled cities to become net positive in science and culture. It would be an interesting exercise to track the science/culture output (and maybe all of the other yields as well even though they don't suffer from diminishing returns) of cities in a game to see how long it takes from when they were settled until they become a net positive.

    Perhaps I'll do that in my next game to get a better idea of how wide is optimal and I'll report back what I find.
     
  12. Owlbebach

    Owlbebach Warlord

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,727
    Location:
    Moscow
    No it is not. In that formula N is number of non-puppets and M is number of puppets. And i have only N in denominator
     
  13. chicorbeef

    chicorbeef Warlord

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2017
    Messages:
    1,228
    Gender:
    Male
    Is Love really that bad? I've never actually picked it but it seems like it can scale pretty well later on.
     
  14. Gazebo

    Gazebo Lord of the Community Patch

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    16,982
    Location:
    Aquidneck Island
    Love is all you need.

    G
     
  15. yogiebere

    yogiebere Civilization City Planner

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    406
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    From the link Owlbebach included, here's the updated formula for science (and culture too I suppose) for annexed/puppeted cities (m=puppet,n=annexed). Of course assuming all cities are equal and not including capital bonuses, wonders, policies, trade routes, etc.

    https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+y+=++(n+m*0.2)/(1+0.07*n)+from+0+to+20

    Analysis: pretty much always a good move to annex over puppet for the raw culture/science, not factoring in maintenance costs or happiness.

    Here's a little exercise if you say a capital + policies + TRs + other bonuses adds 3 cities worth of science/culture and that cities after your top 5 only contribute .7 (assuming they just never reach the same potential as a core city that has more time to hit higher populations. Even then! It still gets to the point where you need to hit the ~12 city mark to make puppets better in terms of science/culture.

    https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+y+=++(3+m*0.2+n-.3*Max[n-5,0])/(1+0.07*n)+from+0+to+20

    I think I might be going for more than 8 cities in my next warmonger game! Maybe 10 or 11 depending on how many are prime locations
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2018
    swapoer, vyyt, Galbias and 1 other person like this.
  16. Owlbebach

    Owlbebach Warlord

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,727
    Location:
    Moscow
    Yeah, thanks. Actually i remember doing that in the past and 3 is a very good assumption for all non-city yields.
     
  17. Bromar1

    Bromar1 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2015
    Messages:
    625
    You get to plant a lot more early academies as Tradition, which further boosts later great scientists
     
  18. YukiN

    YukiN Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2018
    Messages:
    361
    Location:
    Singapore
    How so? Bulbing only depends on how many you planted, not when you planted them.
     
  19. crdvis16

    crdvis16 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    644
    There is added complication on top of this that is a bit harder to model:

    1) the number of turns it takes for the nth city to have its science/culture be a net positive, and then how many turns after that it takes for the city to make up for all the previous turns when it was a detriment. That total turn number needs to be less than the game length, preferably far less as early yields are typically stronger than later yields

    2) science/culture per turn is only one aspect of tech/policy acquisition. There's also all of the other sources of science and culture: instant yields and great person generation. Is the nth city also contributing enough in those areas? It's probably behind in great people but doing well in instant yields is my guess but it's hard to model.

    3) non-science/culture yields. There's no penalty on faith, gold, production, or military supply so more cities are probably always better in those areas. There are some diminishing returns for tourism where you might start hurting yourself by settling more cities, though, especially since it might be harder for the nth city to ever contribute well in tourism given the limited sources for it.
     
  20. yogiebere

    yogiebere Civilization City Planner

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    Messages:
    406
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Certainly wide is not good for tourism. But I was mainly talking about War or Science victories where you need a good balance of science/culture.
     

Share This Page