investigating 9/11

And your sarcasm is the second best I have seen in this thread.

Your argumentation and logic is likewise!

Don't blame yourselves guys, I'm really good at everything.

Wait... I hadn't posted in this thread yet...
 
Um, guess what? That's another completely unfounded consipracy theory.

Ha. I'm actually a centrist according to the political compass. But what does it know? You are obviously an expert on the subject, and anybody who disagrees with you is a communist. Right.

Oops. I obviously meant Clinton.

And unlke GWB, Jimmy Carter was no failure. He simply didn't have the backing of his own party so it was rather impossible for him to get anything done. After all, the only reason he got elected was due to the backlash from RM Nixon's disgrace of this country. He was actually the only president this country has ever had who was truly independent of the political parties since the earliest days of this country.
The conspiracy guys for flight 800 are more credible than any other conspiracy group I've encountered.
http://www.twa800.com/index.htm
I wouldn't say anybody who disagrees with me is a communist, but chances are that anybody who agrees with you is wrong.

Don't tell me that "obviously meant Clinton" because I have no idea how somebody arrives to the twisted conclusions which you do. For example, you herald Jimmy carter as being independent, yet he was unable to gather support from either his party or the opposition.
 
The conspiracy guys for flight 800 are more credible than any other conspiracy group I've encountered.

Well, gee, that must mean it must be true, right?

TWA Flight 800 was the most heavily analyzed aviation accident in world history, and absolutely no evidence of a bomb or a missile were found:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twa_flight_800


I wouldn't say anybody who disagrees with me is a communist, but chances are that anybody who agrees with you is wrong.

Well, you are the one who said it yourself:

You're so far to the left you might fall off the political compass. So the failed president Jimmy Carter warned Bush did he?

Can't you even remember what you wrote 3 days ago?

And guess what? Opinions aren't 'wrong' unless you are referring to moral issues, which is a matter of personal opinion. OTOH, facts can be wrong after they have been found to be false. But you haven't ever done that with a fact I have ever posted, now have you?

Don't tell me that "obviously meant Clinton" because I have no idea how somebody arrives to the twisted conclusions which you do.

Because it is obviously the truth?

Even Carter^H^H^H^H^H Clinton warned Bush about the Al Qaeda before leavling office, and Bush decided not to pursue the programs that he had already set up.

Tell me what's not completely factual with that statement.

For example, you herald Jimmy carter as being independent, yet he was unable to gather support from either his party or the opposition.

Um, that's what being independent means, dude...
 
Tell me what's not completely factual with that statement.



Um, that's what being independent means, dude...
1. Sure, Clinton warned Bush about Al Quada. It probably went something like this, "W, ya' know I sure riled up a hornets nest out there in Mogadishu. (yuk yuk) Osama saw me turn tail & run once we had a few causalities & figured the whole country went soft. No, no Monica, get back down there, I want that hard....(yuk yuk)..... anyway W, all I did was preside over a .com boom & ignore the gathering threat of Islamofacism, but good luck to ya!"
2. I was unaware that being independent meant not being able to get anybody to buy into your ideas. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
1. Sure, Clinton warned Bush about Al Quada. It probably went something like this, "W, ya' know I sure riled up a hornets nest out there in Mogadishu. (yuk yuk) Osama saw me turn tail & run once we had a few causalities & figured the whole country went soft. No, no Monica, get back down there, I want that hard....(yuk yuk)..... anyway W, all I did was preside over a .com boom & ignore the gathering threat of Islamofacism, but good luck to ya!"

O RLY?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/20/u...tell-panel-of-warning-bush-team-on-qaeda.html

Senior Clinton administration officials called to testify next week before the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks say they are prepared to detail how they repeatedly warned their Bush administration counterparts in late 2000 that Al Qaeda posed the worst security threat facing the nation -- and how the new administration was slow to act.

They said the warnings were delivered in urgent post-election intelligence briefings in December 2000 and January 2001 for Condoleezza Rice, who became Mr. Bush's national security adviser; Stephen Hadley, now Ms. Rice's deputy; and Philip D. Zelikow, a member of the Bush transition team, among others.

One official scheduled to testify, Richard A. Clarke, who was President Bill Clinton's counterterrorism coordinator, said in an interview that the warning about the Qaeda threat could not have been made more bluntly to the incoming Bush officials in intelligence briefings that he led.

So you've never heard of Richard Clarke?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8142285767776807556

2. I was unaware that being independent meant not being able to get anybody to buy into your ideas. Thanks for clearing that up.

You seem to be unware of a lot of facts concerning the history of this country. I would suggest you start with google and go from there.
 
So you've never heard of Richard Clarke?

You seem to be unware of a lot of facts concerning the history of this country. I would suggest you start with google and go from there.
1. What the hell would you expect an outgoing bureaucrat to say?
2. Get off your high horse, I've forgotten more history than you know. :lol:
 
Welcome to 8 years ago! Do you want some apple sauce before your 6:00pm bedtime?
 
Back
Top Bottom