Is history useless?

Flip-flopper!
Beards suck. The only reason I haven't shaved mine in the last two weeks is laziness.
Traitorfish said:
Yeah, he's Russian or something.
Puschov. The guy who ran the counterfeiting operation on the Black Island.

I think that in the original French he was "Wronzov" or something, but nobody likes those original names anyway.
 
Male. A few years ago, when the television show Avatar: The Legend of Korra was first announced, I made a commitment to only use avatars of the Avatar Korra until the show was over.

You can check out the threads on the various Washington, DC area CFC meetups for confirmation. I've also met with formerly active forum member Bill3000 in Germany.

Ah I see. I always wonder about the avatar so it is an anime movie.

I don't quite following new anime as the newest anime that I watch is cowboy beebop when I was in highschool. And it really impress me at that time.
 
I wouldn't describe it as "anime", but yes.
 
Ah I see. I always wonder about the avatar so it is an anime movie.

I don't quite following new anime as the newest anime that I watch is cowboy beebop when I was in highschool. And it really impress me at that time.

You haven't missed much...from what I've gather from hardcore Otaku's its been tenchi muyo rip offs and high school drama stuff for the past 6 years or longer...

Cowboy Bebop is still considered number 1 after all these years...

see history does have its uses....:goodjob:
 
Has this thread wandered completely off topic, or is there still hope for it?

I think its concluded already, history is not useless, you want to closed the thread?

You haven't missed much...from what I've gather from hardcore Otaku's its been tenchi muyo rip offs and high school drama stuff for the past 6 years or longer...

Cowboy Bebop is still considered number 1 after all these years...

see history does have its uses

Yea, when I finish watch cowboy beebop, I tell to myself "ok that's it, this is a perfect closure for japanese anime". If Dachs say The Legend of Kora its not fit to be call anime.

And that also exactly what I think when I see how posmodern cowboy beebop is, a radically different time unite in the very same space in that movie; Indian tribal, american modern culture, american colonial culture, futuristic, asian culture, all of it blend, past, present and future come as one in that movie.

A deep psychology conflict of each character, hidden philosophy even it is not as explicit as Ghost In The Shell but is arguably more deeper.

Looking at the history of anime movie, I don't think it also quite fit to categorize this movie as anime, as nothing like it. Again we use history to make us arrive at this conclusion. so we do need history even for watching anime movie.
 
More like Avatar isn't anime because it isn't Japanese.
 
More like Avatar isn't anime because it isn't Japanese.

The art direction has a decidedly anime twinge, and the backgrounds definitely take a page from Miyazaki's playbook, but the overall animation style, the story (both on the macro and micro level), and many of the themes are unquestionably western.
 
Has this thread wandered completely off topic, or is there still hope for it?

Eh. I (sort of) changed my mind about the subject, so I guess it has, unless someone new offers their opinion on it.
 
The main defense of their profession put forth by historians is that we learn history to prevent repeating the mistakes of the past. Of course, the hole in this argument is that every situation is different. I can't come up with any good examples at the moment, but I know that at least some of you understand what I'm saying because this forum is where I got that idea.

It seems to me, then, that the one of the only reasons to study history is because it's interesting. Well, lots of things are interesting. Ancient and medieval weapons technology, in my case. But that subject is almost totally worthless.

I just feel like I wrote it myself!
Exactly what I think!

There is NO any use of history in daily life.
History is just the best (and the longest) storybook ever.
You can compare situations, and you can say "I won't let it happen again", but you can't "learn" anything from history.
It doesn't have any benefit for the human society.

But still, I think that societies have to invest in archaeology.
History doesn't have to be revealed, but it is nice to reveal, and it is also something that societies or humans in general can be proud of.

------------------------

I think that in many places around the world, history shouldn't be taught in schools so deeply.
Normal people should know some general history from their life experience.
Just like they know about Shakespeare plays without learning about them, and just like they know about Elvis Presley songs without learning about rock n roll.

If you like history, you can read about it as much as you want, but you don't have to make people think it is important.
 
I just feel like I wrote it myself!
Exactly what I think!

There is NO any use of history in daily life.
History is just the best (and the longest) storybook ever.
You can compare situations, and you can say "I won't let it happen again", but you can't "learn" anything from history.
It doesn't have any benefit for the human society.

But still, I think that societies have to invest in archaeology.
History doesn't have to be revealed, but it is nice to reveal, and it is also something that societies or humans in general can be proud of.

------------------------

I think that in many places around the world, history shouldn't be taught in schools so deeply.
Normal people should know some general history from their life experience.
Just like they know about Shakespeare plays without learning about them, and just like they know about Elvis Presley songs without learning about rock n roll.

If you like history, you can read about it as much as you want, but you don't have to make people think it is important.

example : History is determine to decide your support and vote for a president that is pro Israel government or not pro Israel government, or not to support any of it at all.

To make a fair judgement or treatment about someone ideology, religious believe, etc so you don't act upon prejudgement or paranoid attitude hence from your poor history knowledge or your wrong understanding about their history.

Even to understand most of knowledge you sometime need to know the history about this certain knowledge, so you can get a better grasp understanding about it.

Your character and your perspective that make you who you are is a result on how you understand and believe what happen in the past that make you what you are now in present and what you aim in the future.

And arguably most public miss perception, violent, and civilization clash also results on wrong understanding of history, or manipulation toward history or how the authority dictate their story as history.

A problem between Chinese peoples, Korean with Japanese, the sentiment and all that stuff also regarding on how difference they see history. And you can add another example, which are many.

So history is not just good story that is not right at all you try to degrade it too much, then what is the difference between "Man and super man" novel by Bernard Shaw which I consider funny and nice with historical book? if it the same, tell me how is it the same?

History is an important part that shape ideology or way of life that is why it useful.

In fact, we need more historian, a good honest apolitic and fair historian.
 
fair historian that see at all side and all data and follow the most truth of it
 
Or making conversation.

Invalid proposal; attempting to file... ERROR. Schema "conversation" not recognized. Please resubmit with appropriate qualification identification.
 
I don't think that that is 'the main defense of [my] profession', but here's mine, and I hope it is of some interest to you:

http://600transformer.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/professor-grumpys-historical-manifesto.html
I'm probably a godawful reader, and possibly a stupid one at that, but is your argument basically that history is useful because it enables us to be more rational, understanding, and skeptical? I think I get what you're saying, but I don't know how to properly explain it.

Of course, even if history's valuable, there's still the depressing and terrifying fact that the market for history professors has a large supply and a negligibly small demand. I'm afraid I'd spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and permanently lose years and years of my life on the road to a doctorate, only to find no job openings. Do you have any advice or comments on getting a job as a history professor?
 
Back
Top Bottom