Is Irish Unification in the near future?

Will Ireland Unite in the Near Future?


  • Total voters
    73
To be honest, I doubt very many people from Britainthink about it much and don't really care. I suspect though that many do, subconciously at least, lump us in as members of the British "family" insofar as they think of us at all whilst perhaps realising that this is a dodgy shorthand...

Yeah I doubt they care much at all, which is why they probably dont lump us in. Thats why parts of London are still thought of as Irish, like Kilburn, whereas there arent scottish parts, because they don't see them as distinct... of course this cant be proven one way or tuther, but I would suspect most people who lived through the troubles in the UK would very much think of us as foreign
 
Sure. We'll all be singing "Land of Hope and Glory" and waving our little Union Jacks again. It'll be the Last Night of the Proms" every night of the week, will it?:crazyeye::rolleyes:
I quite like Land of Hope & Glory. It reminds me of watching Dangermouse as a young fellah.
 
What would the advantages be to us being in the commonwealth?
For me, it's more formalised contact with a whole list of countries who we worked very well and very closely with in the period just after independence, it's give us a chance to win some fudging' medals and it's a tip of the hat to the not inconsiderable number of people such as Corsair who feel that Britain is more than just a neighbour without us having to tug any forelocks. It's win/win for me.
 
For me, it's more formalised contact with a whole list of countries who we worked very well and very closely with in the period just after independence, it's give us a chance to win some fudging' medals and it's a tip of the hat to the not inconsiderable number of people such as Corsair who feel that Britain is more than just a neighbour without us having to tug any forelocks. It's win/win for me.

Not worth having Mrs. Windsor as head of state. We can maintain good relations with them bilaterally and through the EU and UN, no need for us to join a club they run to tip our hat at them. We are already friends.
 
Do all the Commonwealth countries have Liz as a head of state? I was under the impression that it's the situation only with Commonwealth Realms?
 
To be honest, I doubt very many people from Britainthink about it much and don't really care. I suspect though that many do, subconciously at least, lump us in as members of the British "family" insofar as they think of us at all whilst perhaps realising that this is a dodgy shorthand...

I think that sounds about right. I suppose that when I think of George Berkeley, Oscar Wilde, and Bono I don't instinctively think of them as "foreign" in the way that I do when I think of Jonathan Edwards, Mark Twain, and Michael Hutchence. And to my ear, the Irish accent sounds no more "foreign" than any regional British accent - in fact I'm very bad at discerning accents and often don't realise that it is an Irish accent, something that doesn't happen with (say) American or Australian accents. But none of that is because I think Irish people are British, simply that to me Irish and British are so similar that there's not much practical difference.
 
Not worth having Mrs. Windsor as head of state. We can maintain good relations with them bilaterally and through the EU and UN, no need for us to join a club they run to tip our hat at them. We are already friends.
She wouldn't be head of state, we'd remain a republic. As for her being titular head of the Commonwealth? So what? She'd bear inestimably less significance to me in that role than (say) the president of the EU.
 
She wouldn't be head of state, we'd remain a republic. As for her being titular head of the Commonwealth? So what? She'd bear inestimably less significance to me in that role than (say) the president of the EU.

But what are the advantages over the present setup? we already have a very close working relationship with the UK and many of the commonwelath countries, why wouldnt we join, say, a group to make us more integrated with America, or Asia for that matter?
 
We don't want you dirty filthy treasonous Micks in our Queen-fearing countries. :smug:
 
Ireland should join the Commonwealth immediately, and bring the USA in with them while they're it.

Well in that case any two reasonsbly-similar nationalities could be called the same thing, it really isn't as simple as what you want and don't wat. For me, the fact that the overwhelming majority of Irish people would consider themsleves as a distinct nationality from Britishness is enough to make it so. It really is a self-identification issue.
I decided that Ireland is part of Britain because I feel that it's a better way of looking at things. In making my opinion I gave no regard whatsoever to the opinions of the majority and don't see any reason why I should. If people always just thought what the majority thought, we'd still be living in mud huts and eating each other.

My wife is from Chiswick in London so believe me I'm not motivated by some stupid xenophobia. But This really is a subjective issue, and I'm estimating 95% of Irish people would consider themselves as distinct from British, and I bet about 80% of people from the island of Britain would consider Irish people as distinct from them, so to be honest I don't think both arguments hold equal weight.
Sorry if you thought I was accusing you of something as I wasn't at all. But what I mean is that people choose to view the two as separate, because they want to and in Northern Ireland the reason for that is just hatred handed down through generations. In the rest of the world people view the two as separate because it seems natural to them and its how its always been. It doesn't need to be that way forever though.

That is hopelessly reductive IMO. Ireland had a distinct culture, language, legal system and way of life up until the Cromwellian settlement and even up to the 1840s famine the culture and language and way of life was almost totally at odds with Britain. Sure, we're anglophone(ish) but in many other respects we are quite different and closer to (say) the Spanish than the English.
I could also rhyme off the similarities and common history between Ireland and the rest of Britain. What it comes down to is simply whether you want to define Ireland as being part of Britain. Just because more people want to regard them as being separate doesn't make that some sort of eternal truth. It's a subjective issue.

BTW, Why do you think Irish people are so similar to the Spanish?

The single overiding argument against including us with Britain is that it was tried and it was a disasterous failure. We are much better off with a "Good Neighbours" rather than a Sovereign-Subject relationship. That said; I'd be delighted to see us back in the Commonwealth.
It's not about the UK owning Ireland, I'm just saying that to me Britain is a family of nations which includes Ireland. I don't suggest at all that Ireland should be part of the UK as there's no reason why they should be.


I think I should also point out that I have a very inclusive view of nationality in general- I think that the Austrians are German, the Walloons are French, the Flemish are Dutch and that Scandavia and possibly the USA are supernations like Britain. If the people there disagree with me, I don't really care. Nationality and all that are just one big flux, shaped by the currents of history. Identities don't stay still forever. What matters isn't where things are or have been but where they are going, and to me we all need to come together and stop all this petty balkanisation wherever necessary.
 
Does the USA supernation include Canada? :D
 
Does the USA supernation include Canada? :D
All that and more. The pink is you lot.

1984-world-map.jpg
 
The trend in Europe is for countries to de-centralize and for regions to gain more autonomy. Irish unification would go against this trend. If anything, we'll see the opposite -- Wales becoming autonomous, the Basques and Catalans getting more independence, etc.
 
The trend in Europe is for countries to de-centralize and for regions to gain more autonomy. Irish unification would go against this trend. If anything, we'll see the opposite -- Wales becoming autonomous, the Basques and Catalans getting more independence, etc.
Not a chance, a more passive/aggressive bunch with respect to the "Union" you would never find. Plaid Cymru is a fringe party and the heavily-populated, anglophone southern belt is inherently distrustful of the northern, and western Welsh-speaking regions. There is absolutely no coherent groundswell of support for independence there.
 
Back
Top Bottom