It is God ordained behavior

I don't get the logic here. We observe behavior A is man, therefore behavior A is good. So if we observe behavior B in man, it is not good, but they should instead act according to A, even though there isn't any reason why it should be better than B.

In more concrete terms, belligerence isn't always the best option, not even for "primitive" humans or primates or whatever you're making a comparison too. Humans are social animals after all.

They rely on NATO and France to keep their peace for them. So they don't have to.

Or is it Monaco that's tied directly to France? Can't remember.
You're probably thinking of Monaco. Luxembourg mainly relies on banks and Jean-Claude Juncker's deep voice calming everyone to sleep.

Can some moderator move this thread to the Chamber, where I now post with the civilized people. I posted here by mistake. Dreadful mistake, but we are not perfect.
Now don't show deference to the moderators! Issue a clear and definite declaration of intent as God wanted you to!
 
I don't get it.
 
Are you not a Psalms 23:1-6 kind of of guy?

:lol: Maybe its time for another church council....

Say somebody strikes you on one cheek you show him the the other one - you know the wolf side.
 
Dogs stick up their tails and growl. Monkeys beat their chests and shriek. Fish flare their gills and fins. A snake coils and rattles its tail.

This is the way that species defend themselves. A clear and stark warning. Followed by clear consequences if the warning is not heeded.

This is ordained by the creator. If it were not His will then He would have created other behavior.

And if you don't believe in God, you must admit it is the way of nature.

Therefore, it follows that a leader of men or nations should ensure the safety and security of his charge by exhibiting the same behavior. Displays of power and declarations of intent.

This behavior is a clear deterrent to aggression.

Some say, that is silly primitive behavior. Is it now? Must we not communicate in terms that aggressors will understand? In the jungle you must speak the language of apes.

If you do it not, and appear weak, you invite attack. And you will be attacked. And run over if you are perceived as being unwilling to fight back.

This is why a country needs a commander in chief that will be strong at all times, especially when citizen's lives have been taken and never weak or go out of his way to be inoffensive to those who would oppose us.

God and nature is offended by such a weak stance, and it shall NEVER be said that the people prefer shame to pride.

And primates defecate at will. Thanks for the demo.
 
So Jesus was completely wrong about turning the other cheek? He should have growled, shown his teeth, and generally acted like an animal in the wild instead?

I just love these threads that backfire in such a spectacular manner.
 
Honestly guys this thread has become a gem. I think we should have special forum for these kind of threads so one can go there and re-read them to get some insane laugh once a while.
 
Honestly guys this thread has become a gem. I think we should have special forum for these kind of threads so one can go there and re-read them to get some insane laugh once a while.

It makes one insane to laugh at this driveling?
 
Oh, is it drivel? I'd better go and read the OP again.

edit: well, I've checked. What's it about? I can't make head nor tail of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom