I've just convinced myself to that 9/11 is a conspiracy

What do you think caused the *destruction* of the twin towers.

  • The planes crash into the building(s). The force/explosion destroys it.

    Votes: 11 13.6%
  • The planes crash into the building(s). The burning jet fuel [s]melts[/s]weakens the steel constructi

    Votes: 30 37.0%
  • The planes crash into the building(s). They destroy them. I don't know how exacly.

    Votes: 20 24.7%
  • Something strikes the building(s). I am not certain if it was a plane.

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Planes crash into the b(s) but, cause minor dmg to the structure.Explos. in the building destroy it.

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Planes crash into the b(s). They cause major dmg but not enough to destroy the floors below impact.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The planes crash into the building(s). Thermite reaction destroys the steelstructure (planted).

    Votes: 4 4.9%
  • Something strikes the building(s). What ever it is it is not enough to destroy them alone.

    Votes: 3 3.7%
  • An other theory.

    Votes: 4 4.9%
  • I honestly don't know what to think.

    Votes: 7 8.6%

  • Total voters
    81
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I meant the majority of the people ive seen attacking them on this crazy internet.

You guys are sensitive. lol

No.

You specifically stated that everyone who has attacked 9/11 conspiracy theorists is a neo-con.

I am specifically telling you you are full of it. You made an untrue statement, not I. Deal.
 
No.

You specifically stated that everyone who has attacked 9/11 conspiracy theorists is a neo-con.

I am specifically telling you you are full of it. You made an untrue statement, not I. Deal.

I didnt mean to say that, thats not what was going through my head

Now im going to have the whole forum hang me because of this.

:lol:
 
People often win arguments on the internetz by trying to make a fool out of the other one, just like in politics. Rarely they make an effort to present something of their own that's substantial that they accuse the other side of not doing.

So if you say "all Potatoes are yellow" (even though orange and a few other rare colours exist) you'll get these people hanging over you big time for a long period of time.
 
People often win arguments on the internetz by trying to make a fool out of the other one, just like in politics. Rarely they make an effort to present something of their own that's substantial that they accuse the other side of not doing.

So if you say "all Potatoes are yellow" (even though orange and a few other rare colours exist) you'll get these people hanging over you big time for a long period of time.

But you have yet to present any evidence; what you have presented amounts to strawmans, misquotes, non-sources, etc.
 
Lies and slander!


All of it.


It was Divine retribution for our lenient and indulgent ways.
 
People often win arguments on the internetz by trying to make a fool out of the other one, just like in politics. Rarely they make an effort to present something of their own that's substantial that they accuse the other side of not doing.

So if you say "all Potatoes are yellow" (even though orange and a few other rare colours exist) you'll get these people hanging over you big time for a long period of time.

iquiteu6.jpg
 
I think an Invisible Godzilla threw the planes into the towers and then whipped them with his tail.

But seriously I believe it was the combination of the jet crash/explosion and the fires which weakened the steel.
 
Your gov did quite alot. A majority of the hijackers were listed as suspected terrorists or security threats. The CIA also had some good info on that an atack was going to happen.

That's all on that topic. Don't know much more really. I'm not to interested in who or why just what. Who or why will come out sooner or later anyway.
 
I don't see the option for:

The planes crash into the building(s). The burning jet fuel weakens the steel construction.

I was looking for that one as well. The conspiracy theorists are right on one point, jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. But a 50% reduction in strength is pretty detrimental to any building.
 
Steel melts at xxxx degrees. Like 3,5k or something. I forgot how much.
Thats what the thermite theory advocates belive as thermite can burn at 4,5k.


Really though, if someone wants, change the option.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom