You sound like Martin Luther.I would complain about it. Our lord and savior is not meant to be used as a marketing ploy.
You sound like Martin Luther.I would complain about it. Our lord and savior is not meant to be used as a marketing ploy.
So, is Coke the new blood of christ?
![]()
I would complain about it. Our lord and savior is not meant to be used as a marketing ploy. Plus it does not even make sense since he was the one who overturned merchant tables that were inside the grounds of the Second Temple in Jerusalem.
Unlike the heretic, I remain loyal to the Catholic ChurchYou sound like Martin Luther.
So all of a sudden when I state my opinion relating to religion, you consider it whining? Please, Cry me a river.Boy you never cease to find religious things to whine about.
The point that I was trying to get across is that the use of any holy person or place as a tool to get money and marketing is sacreligious.Why does marketing have to be historically accurate? Is it some sin to use Jesus of Nazareth in a commerical? That's a rhetorical question, but I know you'll answer it anyway.
Martin Luther was a reformer, not a rebel. If trying to fix a broken system is heretical, then by all means, demonize him.Unlike the heretic, I remain loyal to the Catholic Church.
The point that I was trying to get across is that the use of any holy person or place as a tool to get money and marketing is sacreligious.
He was only a heritic when he split away from the Catholic Church in a schism that paved the way for Lutheranism and the other Protestant Reformation. Also, in no way did I demonized him in any way.Martin Luther was a reformer, not a rebel. If trying to fix a broken system is heretical, then by all means, demonize him.
Do you know why they are considered holy? People, places, and things? Is because people hold special reverence for them. Marketing them and using them for money is sacreligious because it is using a holy object, place, or person for materialistic gains.Why?
Do you know why they are considered holy? People, places, and things? Is because people hold special reverence for them. Marketing them and using them for money is sacreligious because it is using a holy object, place, or person for materialistic gains.
Tithes are only used for the maintenance of the church and any extra goes into local charities. It had to take the Protestant Reformation and the Council of Trent to fix the mess that the Medici Popes have cause.Wonder why tithes are collected....
So does The Eiffel Tower, the Washington Monument, Grand Canyon. Your point?And the Vatican does, tours
So does The Eiffel Tower, the Washington Monument, Grand Canyon. Your point?
I dont see anything wrong tours in the Vatican. They have a thing called a Museum (Museums need to have maintenance too, nothing in this world is free) for people to go into and see the history of the Vatican and their collection of artwork. Nice try trying to accuse the Church of using holy places and things for money.My point is these arent considered holy.
See your post.
Look at my post again, I specifically stated that thythes are for the expenses of the church, any extra money left over goes to local charities! No money gained at all!No, CG did not mention expense, he said plainly that mrketing and using anything holy to make money and material gain is sacrilegous.