lockdowns need an evidential burden to justify that as the reason. a burden covid never reached. it is likely they did more damage to public health than helping it.
the abuse of "emergency measures" was awful too.
if your goal was even longer/more widespread suffering + higher marginal deaths then doing nothing, then sure. that's an awful goal, however.
biden actively attempted to implement measures against the constitution, doing it in advance knowing it would challenge and fail because that was somehow okay for him. he also tried to do really wacky stuff with osha.
nonsense. not only did people have to choose between employment and gene therapy, information about the latter was suppressed at direct behest of the government (1st amendment violation), which big tech has now openly admitted. biden administration reached out to them wrt which information gets blocked or suppressed, directly. as this was being done at behest of government, the private organization defense is not relevant in that context.
not only was that a vile act, it was also illegal. will be amusing to see people blame trump for the therapy complications though.
much of the economic damage can be attributed to the response to the disease, rather than the disease itself. not all of it, but a lot.
"perhaps biden should have deliberately ruined the country and put as much blood on his hands as possible". fortunately, biden's puppet masters are not quite that evil. price fixing is a fast ticket to hell.
"nationalize the economy" = instant impeachment or well-justified secession/civil war. that's looney tunes stuff. political suicide using a process guaranteed to run a country into the ground.