Pontiuth Pilate
Republican Jesus!
The Friedman Unit was discussed here:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=209057
The summary: Thomas Friedman and other assorted idiot pundits have been saying that "the next six months" in Iraq will be "crucial"... for the past four years.
Now Joe Lieberman has invented his own relativistic unit of time, the Lieberman Moment.
That's the moment when things in Iraq officially start turning around and looking hopeful.
And it turns out that it's exactly when you finish reading this sentence. Wait, nope, it's now. Nope, now it's.... NOW. Wait....
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/27/lieberman
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=209057
The summary: Thomas Friedman and other assorted idiot pundits have been saying that "the next six months" in Iraq will be "crucial"... for the past four years.
Now Joe Lieberman has invented his own relativistic unit of time, the Lieberman Moment.
That's the moment when things in Iraq officially start turning around and looking hopeful.
And it turns out that it's exactly when you finish reading this sentence. Wait, nope, it's now. Nope, now it's.... NOW. Wait....
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/27/lieberman
On the Senate floor today, Lieberman implored his fellow Senators to vote Yes on the amendment to nix withdrawal timetables. He argued that for the "first time in a long time" there is now finally reason for optimism about Iraq -- even though he's been steadily arguing for months and months in the recent past that there was cause for such optimism:
"It is clear that for the first time in a long time, there is reason for cautious optimism about Iraq."
But...but...sputter...sputter...
If this is the "first time in a long time" that there's been "reason for optimism," does that mean Lieberman didn't mean it all those other times in the recent past when he suggested there was reason for optimism about Iraq?
Lieberman speech to the American Enterprise Institute, January 5, 2007 (via Nexis):
My own impression, having been there again most recently, is that it remains winnable. And it remains winnable in the first case for something that should be self-evident, but I hear it from the Iraqis we talk to, I heard it from our own soldiers who interact with the Iraqis...our troops believe they can win, and that's really important.
And a colonel followed me out and said, quite emotionally, "Sir, I regret that I did not have a chance to say this in the meeting. I want you to know on behalf of the soldiers in my unit and myself that we understand why we're here. We believe in the mission. We are confident we can win it. And we want to fight it to a victorious finish. We need some more troops to make that happen."
And that's what this moment is all about.
Lieberman-Lamont debate, July 6, 2006 (via Nexis):
LIEBERMAN: The situation in Iraq is a lot better, different than it was a year ago. The Iraqis held three elections. They formed a unity government. They are on the way to building a free and independent Iraq. Their military -- two-thirds of their military is now ready, on their own, to lead the fight with some logistical backing from the U.S. or stand up on their own totally. That`s progress.
Also from the Lieberman-Lamont debate:
I am confident that the situation is improving enough on the ground that by the end of this year we will being to draw down significant numbers of American troops and by the end of next year more than half of the troops who are there now will be home.
Op-ed by Lieberman in The Wall Street Journal:
I have just returned from my fourth trip to Iraq in the past 17 months and can report real progress there. More work needs to be done, of course, but the Iraqi people are in reach of a watershed transformation from the primitive, killing tyranny of Saddam to modern, self-governing, self-securing nationhood--unless the great American military that has given them and us this unexpected opportunity is prematurely withdrawn.
Progress is visible and practical.