Let's create a micronation!

Discussion in 'Model Parliament' started by Tee Kay, Jul 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Ninja

    The Ninja Secretary of Defense

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    148
    Location:
    Space, the final frontier...
    Aye aye, sir! :D

    The Ninja :ninja:
     
  2. h4ppy

    h4ppy You sir, pineapple?

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Messages:
    5,988
    Location:
    H4ppy Valley
    I do not support this.
     
  3. Ball Lightning

    Ball Lightning www.sporedum.net

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,126
    Location:
    Thunderstorm, Melbourne, Australia
  4. Captain2

    Captain2 ಠ_ృ

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,727
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I support this as well

    should things get tricky i also support the founding of the NESuits
     
  5. The Yankee

    The Yankee The New Yawker Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2002
    Messages:
    19,467
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Cast my vote in the "No" lot, though this idea is better than the first fake map we had.
     
  6. Equuleus

    Equuleus King

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    928
    I vote Yes.
    Yes:8 No:2
     
  7. Red Door

    Red Door Man of Mayhem

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,665
    Location:
    USA #1
    I say "No." This is not Micronations, this is Model Parliament for CFC, let's keep it that way. If you wanna start a nation on Micronations, be my guest, but it'd be stupid to include Model Parliament in it.
     
  8. Bill3000

    Bill3000 OOOH NOOOOOOO! Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    18,464
    Location:
    Quinquagesimusermia
    You're starting to confusing people.

    All I really suggested was for us to join the MCS map - there would be no difference from being isolated outside of the fact that we get to occasionally talk with other nations. It will probably be able to be done because I could pull some strings.
     
  9. Captain2

    Captain2 ಠ_ృ

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,727
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    wouldnt that be the same thing as being in it?

    you cant be isolated except for occasional communication, if your Isolated, nobody talks to you, if you have rare communication, your just not popular

    but this would certainly make it far more interesting, who cares what a parties foreign plans are unless there are foreign nations?
     
  10. Ball Lightning

    Ball Lightning www.sporedum.net

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,126
    Location:
    Thunderstorm, Melbourne, Australia
  11. Ball Lightning

    Ball Lightning www.sporedum.net

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,126
    Location:
    Thunderstorm, Melbourne, Australia
  12. Perfection

    Perfection The Great Head.

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    49,824
    Location:
    Salisbury Plain
    Isolation is lame! We don't want to be isolated and we don't have to be. With a real world map we can easily have our GMs simulate the actions of foriegn nations something that we could not do in this micronation world.

    For example in the last model parlaiment we intervened militarily in the Haitian power struggles of 2004.

    Plus we don't need to gather divergent accounts of this psuedohistory and can just go along with known history.

    It is far better gameplay to have a altered real world then a fcitional world especially one run by other people.
     
  13. Olleus

    Olleus Deity

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,478
    Location:
    Beyond the Veil
    I'm undecided at the moment, although I am leaning towards micronations, as it seems to be able to reproduce events very easily and allows communication with other nations. However, if the GM can make enough events and can pretend to be other nations so we can talk to them, I'm fine with using the real world.

    Count my vote as undecided for the moment.
     
  14. Ball Lightning

    Ball Lightning www.sporedum.net

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,126
    Location:
    Thunderstorm, Melbourne, Australia
  15. JohnRM

    JohnRM Don't make me destroy you

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    11,582
    Location:
    Death Star
    No. And frankly, I am getting tired of going over the same issue repeatedly until some of you people get the answer that you want.
     
  16. Splime

    Splime Regular Lurker

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    804
    Location:
    SF, CA, USA
    No. Please, make it the real world, and prevent further confusion and complication.

    Yes: 8 No: 5 Undecided: 1
     
  17. Godwynn

    Godwynn March to the Sea

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    20,498
    I'm with you.

    And No.

    Yes: 8
    No: 6
     
  18. Canuck3

    Canuck3 Pastafarian

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Canada
    I support this

    Yes: 9
    No:6
     
  19. Zarn

    Zarn Le Républicain Catholique

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2002
    Messages:
    11,589
    Location:
    New Jersey/ Delaware Valley
    No way, and the maps polls support the real world.
     
  20. mangxema

    mangxema I

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    3,310
    Location:
    PCB, FL, USA
    Really? Hell yes! :D

    No to MCS. Yes 9 - No 8
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page