Let's create a micronation!

[The Ninja]

If all else fails, we can teach them the basics of NESing...

Aye aye, sir!

The Ninja

 

[h4ppy]

I do not support this.

 

[Ball Lightning]

Yes: 6 No: 1

 

[Captain2]

I support this as well

should things get tricky i also support the founding of the NESuits

 

[The Yankee]

Cast my vote in the "No" lot, though this idea is better than the first fake map we had.

 

[Equuleus]

I vote Yes.
Yes:8 No:2

 

[Red Door]

I say "No." This is not Micronations, this is Model Parliament for CFC, let's keep it that way. If you wanna start a nation on Micronations, be my guest, but it'd be stupid to include Model Parliament in it.

 

[Bill3000]

You're starting to confusing people.

All I really suggested was for us to join the MCS map - there would be no difference from being isolated outside of the fact that we get to occasionally talk with other nations. It will probably be able to be done because I could pull some strings.

 

[Captain2]

wouldnt that be the same thing as being in it?

you cant be isolated except for occasional communication, if your Isolated, nobody talks to you, if you have rare communication, your just not popular

but this would certainly make it far more interesting, who cares what a parties foreign plans are unless there are foreign nations?

 

[Ball Lightning]

And with this we would be able to achieve something which we had to work hard for.

 

[Ball Lightning]

Yes 8 No 3

 

[Perfection]

You're starting to confusing people.

All I really suggested was for us to join the MCS map - there would be no difference from being isolated outside of the fact that we get to occasionally talk with other nations. It will probably be able to be done because I could pull some strings.

Isolation is lame! We don't want to be isolated and we don't have to be. With a real world map we can easily have our GMs simulate the actions of foriegn nations something that we could not do in this micronation world.

For example in the last model parlaiment we intervened militarily in the Haitian power struggles of 2004.

Plus we don't need to gather divergent accounts of this psuedohistory and can just go along with known history.

It is far better gameplay to have a altered real world then a fcitional world especially one run by other people.

 

[member66170]

I'm undecided at the moment, although I am leaning towards micronations, as it seems to be able to reproduce events very easily and allows communication with other nations. However, if the GM can make enough events and can pretend to be other nations so we can talk to them, I'm fine with using the real world.

Count my vote as undecided for the moment.

 

[Ball Lightning]

Yes: 8 No: 3 Undecided: 1

 

[JohnRM]

No. And frankly, I am getting tired of going over the same issue repeatedly until some of you people get the answer that you want.

 

[Splime]

No. Please, make it the real world, and prevent further confusion and complication.

Yes: 8 No: 5 Undecided: 1

 

[Godwynn]

No. And frankly, I am getting tired of going over the same issue repeatedly until some of you people get the answer that you want.

I'm with you.

And No.

Yes: 8
No: 6

 

[Canuck3]

I support this

Yes: 9
No:6

 

[Zarn]

No way, and the maps polls support the real world.

 

[mangxema]

We don't want to be isolated and we don't have to be. With a real world map we can easily have our GMs simulate the actions of foriegn nations something that we could not do in this micronation world.

For example in the last model parlaiment we intervened militarily in the Haitian power struggles of 2004.

Really? Hell yes!

No to MCS. Yes 9 - No 8