Now wouldn't it be really something if this was a test question and indeed they wanted -1? ^^I assume it's a typo ? Technically the answer is actually -1 because the question doesn't state it's the lowest common positive factor, but that's even more ridiculous.
Does that mean that technically the lowest common multiple of any two numbers is minus infinity (or aleph null or whatever)?Technically the answer is actually -1 because the question doesn't state it's the lowest common positive factor, but that's even more ridiculous.
But proof by intimidation is typically a stronger form of proof by authority.Any proof that seems complicated enough to not be read in its entirety by the reader is a proof by intimidation.
What about the question in the spoiler?
I am shockedI have no idea