I agree with you about the Dwarves, and the hobbits
. If you think it is necessary a Númenór civ would be sort of fun. What we do have a problem with though, is the Elves, perhaps we should add some more Civs? Can't go wrong with Rivendel
. I could think of some others of course. We can have 32 civs, and adding some under-dog civs that exist just for a fun twist, such as the rangers, wouldn't be a problem to add in a future version, but not top priority. Did you see the edit of my last post? Did you look at that thread? Sween32 might remember, he had some pretty bizarre idea, what with ravens and airplanes
. It's not such a bad idea though, a raven could be a scout for Isengard.
I agree with Mrtn, especially about the Ancient civs you brought up... such as the Númenór
.
However Isnt that the way Tolkien spelled it? What about the other words he uses with dots.
If it does, we should get on our knees and start worshiping Kindred now.
Thanks for the description of Beleriand, GEChallenger. But that points out a problem, should it be a Gulf on the Map, or otherwise? Moreover, just how much sank, Ill have to take a look at that map site again.
Less Civs? Perhaps, but adding 3 more civs is not going to reduce the quality of any others, or the ones being added. But, we should probably start with as little as we can, add on as we go.



I agree with Mrtn, especially about the Ancient civs you brought up... such as the Númenór

However Isnt that the way Tolkien spelled it? What about the other words he uses with dots.
Probably notmrtn- But, talk is cheep, when we start doing something, that might change.

Thanks for the description of Beleriand, GEChallenger. But that points out a problem, should it be a Gulf on the Map, or otherwise? Moreover, just how much sank, Ill have to take a look at that map site again.
Less Civs? Perhaps, but adding 3 more civs is not going to reduce the quality of any others, or the ones being added. But, we should probably start with as little as we can, add on as we go.