LSD Found to Reduce Anxiety in Terminally Ill Patients

BvBPL

Pour Decision Maker
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
7,186
Location
At the bar
It has been about fifty years since LSD was made illegal in the US and since then there has been very little research on the drug. A recent Swiss study examined the use of LSD to reduce anxiety in terminally ill patients. The study found that use of LSD reduced anxiety in the research subjects for at least a year. The study was too small to be conclusive.

Does the idea that LSD may reduce anxiety in terminally ill patients, and keep it down for at least a year, mesh with your personal experiences with the drug? Do you think that the reduction in anxiety may be effective on people with other forms of anxiety?

News story.
Study.
 
Like many drugs, this one has medicinal as well as recreational uses. That it's illegal for both is a shame.

Does the idea that LSD may reduce anxiety in terminally ill patients, and keep it down for at least a year, mesh with your personal experiences with the drug? Do you think that the reduction in anxiety may be effective on people with other forms of anxiety?

What I think doesn't matter. The only thing that matters are the scientific studies and their results.
 
LSD has numerous effects. Some of them really quite startling, I have heard.

As far as I know LSD's principal effects don't include reducing anxiety. But there's no reason why anxiety reduction shouldn't be a side-effect of the effects it does have for a terminally ill patient.

If you see what I mean.

If you're terminally ill, I think perhaps you should be free to choose any kind of medication (though I'd stop short of euthanasia, myself) including psychoactive ones.
 
Does the idea that LSD may reduce anxiety in terminally ill patients, and keep it down for at least a year, mesh with your personal experiences with the drug?
How many of those who have mostly or completely negative perceptions of the drug have any actual personal experience with it?

Norwegian University of Science and Technology: LSD and other psychedelics not linked with mental health problems

The researchers found that lifetime use of psilocybin or mescaline and past year use of LSD were associated with lower rates of serious psychological distress. Lifetime use of LSD was also significantly associated with a lower rate of outpatient mental health treatment and psychiatric medicine prescription.

The design of the study makes it impossible to determine exactly why the researchers found what they found.

"We cannot exclude the possibility that use of psychedelics might have a negative effect on mental health for some individuals or groups, perhaps counterbalanced at a population level by a positive effect on mental health in others," they wrote.

Nevertheless, "recent clinical trials have also failed to find any evidence of any lasting harmful effects of psychedelics," the researchers said, which supports the robustness of the PLOS One findings.

In fact, says Krebs, "many people report deeply meaningful experiences and lasting beneficial effects from using psychedelics."

"Other studies have found no evidence of health or social problems among people who had used psychedelics hundreds of times in legally-protected religious ceremonies," adds Johansen.
 
Ooh. Good question!

Alternatively, how many of those who have any actual personal experience of it have completely positive perceptions?
 
I certainly wouldn't recommend driving or getting into negative and stressful situations while under the influence of psychedelics. I also don't think that minors should be exposed to them.
 
No indeed. Minors shouldn't be exposed to a whole host of things. LSD is certainly among them.

On the other hand, if something isn't a good idea for minors there's certainly a reason for caution for its use by others, too.

How about terminally ill minors?
 
I also don't support allowing children to smoke marijuana or drink alcohol, or at least the latter only on special occasions. But I find absolutely nothing wrong with adults doing so when used in moderation.

If a medical doctor prescribed LSD for a terminally ill minor, I'd certainly not criticize him for it.
 
How many of those who have mostly or completely negative perceptions of the drug have any actual personal experience with it?

I know many people who had fun on acid, several who count it as having had a major beneficial effect on their lives, a handful who had traumatic experiences, one who ended up suffering from a serious mental illness (with acid as a direct trigger - there are a couple more for whom heavy use may have been a contributing factor), and another two who were hospitalised for doing insane things under the influence (jumping face first into a campfire; attempting to fly over a barbed wire fence).

From the people I know who know the drug best, the standard response to questions about safe use is "be very, very careful, it's not for everybody, and you should never take it unless you are absolutely sure that you're in the right mood and environment".

I'd say that, if this study proves accurate, then LSD ought to be made available for therapeutic purposes, provided that proper precautions are taken. Bearing in mind that consumption of the drug can lead to powerful delusions, it would seem important to make sure that recipients are never allowed control of their own dose, for example.
 
I see nothing wrong with allowing terminally ill patients to use whatever drug they feel like. If I were terminally ill I'd probably be high quite often.
 
I know many people who had fun on acid, several who count it as having had a major beneficial effect on their lives, a handful who had traumatic experiences, one who ended up suffering from a serious mental illness (with acid as a direct trigger - there are a couple more for whom heavy use may have been a contributing factor), and another two who were hospitalised for doing insane things under the influence (jumping face first into a campfire; attempting to fly over a barbed wire fence).
We have all heard such anecdotes. But how many of them are corroborated facts instead of likely apocryphal?

From the people I know who know the drug best, the standard response to questions about safe use is "be very, very careful, it's not for everybody, and you should never take it unless you are absolutely sure that you're in the right mood and environment".
Indeed. I couldn't have said it any better myself with the exception of one "very" and the "absolutely" and "never".
 
We have all heard such anecdotes. But how many of them are corroborated facts instead of likely apocryphal?

I know the people personally, and I've spoken directly to them about the experiences. In the cases of the guy who was institutionalised and the two who were hospitalised, I saw the results with my own eyes (indeed, I watched the campfire guy being loaded into the ambulance). I've also been around people under the influence on occasions too numerous to mention (often as their designated driver).

I'm not sure this is the case, but if you're looking to make the argument that acid is essentially harmless, then you're barking up the wrong tree. All the acid heads I've known have been in agreement on this: there's no such thing as a totally safe trip. And that's why they're all quite particular about when and where (and, especially, with whom) they take it.
 
I would say that there are quite possibly other mitigating factors which you might not be familiar. But that one should indeed be "quite particular about when and where (and, especially, with whom) they take it".

And I am certainly not stating that "acid is essentially harmless". It is an extremely powerful psychoactive drug.

I also think the term "acid head" is a pejorative.
 
They do tend to refer to themselves as "heads". Or they did, back in the day.
 
Aye, in my experience it's often used to distinguish those with a real affinity for and commitment to the drug from those who merely drop the odd dot at a party every now and then.
 
I have yet to even meet a single "acid head" based on the definition of the word.

There was also a lot of "bad acid" back in the days when it was popular. All sorts of toxic substances were passed off as being LSD.

The stories of people jumping out of windows and such are largely apocryphal.
 
How many of those who have mostly or completely negative perceptions of the drug have any actual personal experience with it?

It is fairly common for people to have negative experiences with the drug. Even people with previous positive experiences with the drug can still have bad trips.

I think it is important to highlight that in this case the patients were overseen by mental health professionals during the length of their drug treatment. This wasn't a case where the researches handed out a few tabs and said "go at it." The importance of being in a safe and secure environment for an LSD trip cannot be overstated.
 
It is wonderful that psychedelics are finally being given a modicum of academic respect. It is true that they should be taken in situations where one feels most comfortable and stress-free, but in the right settings psychedelics can be magical. :)

Bill Wilson, founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, advocated strongly in favor of treating alcoholics with LSD. Curing alcohol addiction requires deep introspection and a new way of looking at yourself and your life. Psychedelics like mushrooms and LSD are one way of doing this.

LSD may help treat alcoholism

The psychedelic drug LSD can help people with alcoholism quit or cut back their drinking, according to a new analysis of data originally collected in the 1960s. The study adds to a renaissance of research interest in mind-expanding medications for psychiatric disorders.

Norwegian scientists conducted a meta-analysis, combining the results of six randomized trials that tested the effect of a single dose of LSD for alcoholism in 536 adults. Researchers found that 59% of participants who took acid either dramatically cut back their drinking or quit, compared with 38% of controls, who either took a much smaller dose of acid or used another drinking-prevention treatment. Only eight cases of adverse effects or “bad trips” were reported, none of them lasting longer than the high itself.

Earlier conclusions from the literature have suggested that LSD was not effective for alcoholism, but those results appear to e related to the fact that individual studies on the subject did not include enough participants to demonstrate significant differences between the groups.

“LSD had a significant beneficial effect on alcohol misuse at the first reported follow-up assessment,” write the authors of the new paper, published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology. “The effectiveness of a single dose of LSD compares well with the effectiveness of daily naltrexone [reVia, Vivitrol] acamprosate [Campral], or disulfiram [Antabuse].” Those are the drugs currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat alcoholism.

Magic Mushrooms improve long term psychological well-being

The psychedelic drug in magic mushrooms may have lasting medical and spiritual benefits, according to new research from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

The mushroom-derived hallucinogen, called psilocybin, is known to trigger transformative spiritual states, but at high doses it can also result in “bad trips” marked by terror and panic. The trick is to get the dose just right, which the Johns Hopkins researchers report having accomplished.

In their study, the Hopkins scientists were able to reliably induce transcendental experiences in volunteers, which offered long-lasting psychological growth and helped people find peace in their lives — without the negative effects.

“The important point here is that we found the sweet spot where we can optimize the positive persistent effects and avoid some of the fear and anxiety that can occur and can be quite disruptive,” says lead author Roland Griffiths, professor of behavioral biology at Hopkins.

Giffiths’ study involved 18 healthy adults, average age 46, who participated in five eight-hour drug sessions with either psilocybin — at varying doses — or placebo. Nearly all the volunteers were college graduates and 78% participated regularly in religious activities; all were interested in spiritual experience.

Fourteen months after participating in the study, 94% of those who received the drug said the experiment was one of the top five most meaningful experiences of their lives; 39% said it was the single most meaningful experience.

Critically, however, the participants themselves were not the only ones who saw the benefit from the insights they gained: their friends, family member and colleagues also reported that the psilocybin experience had made the participants calmer, happier and kinder.

Ultimately, Griffiths and his colleagues want to see if the same kind of psychedelic experience could help ease anxiety and fear over the long term in cancer patients or others facing death. And following up on tantalizing clues from early research on hallucinogenic drugs like LSD, mescaline and psilocybin in the 1960s (which are all now illegal), researchers are also studying whether transcendental experiences could help spur recovery from addiction and treat other psychological problems like depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

For Griffiths’ current experiment, participants were housed in a living room-like setting designed to be calm, comfortable and attractive. While under the influence, they listened to classical music on headphones, wore eyeshades and were instructed to “direct their attention inward.”

Each participant was accompanied by two other research-team members: a “monitor” and an “assistant monitor,” who both had previous experience with people on psychedelic drugs and were empathetic and supportive. Before the drug sessions, the volunteers became acquainted enough with their team so that they felt familiar and safe. Although the experiments took place in the Hopkins hospital complex in order to ensure prompt medical attention in the event that it was needed, it never was.

As described by early advocates of the use of psychedelics — from ancient shamans to Timothy Leary and the Grateful Dead — the psilocybin experience typically involves a sense of oneness with the universe and with others, a feeling of transcending time, space and other limitations, coupled with a sense of holiness and sacredness. Overwhelmingly, these experiences are difficult to put into words, but many of Griffiths’ participants said they were left with the sense that they understood themselves and others better and therefore had greater compassion and patience.

“I feel that I relate better in my marriage. There is more empathy — a greater understanding of people and understanding their difficulties and less judgment,” said one participant. “Less judging of myself, too.”

Another said: “I have better interaction with close friends and family and with acquaintances and strangers. … My alcohol use has diminished dramatically.”

To zero in on the “sweet spot” of dosing, Griffiths started half the volunteers on a low dose and gradually increased their doses over time (with placebo sessions randomly interspersed); the other half started on a high dose and worked their way down.

Those who started on a low dose found that their experiences tended to get better as the dose increased, probably because they learned what to expect and how to handle it. But people who started with high doses were more likely to experience anxiety and fear (though these feeling didn’t last long and sometimes resolved into euphoria or a sense of transcendence).

“If we back the dose down a little, we have just as much of the same positive effects. The properties of the mystical experience remain the same, but there’s a fivefold drop in anxiety and fearfulness,” Griffiths says.

Some past experiments with psychedelics in the ’60s used initial high doses of the drugs — the “blast people away with a high dose” model, says Griffiths — to try to treat addiction. “Some of the early work in addictions was done with the idea of, ‘O.K., let’s model the ‘bottoming-out’ crisis and make use of the dark side of [psychedelic] compounds. That didn’t work,” Griffiths says.

It may even have backfired: other research on addictions shows that coercion, humiliation and other attempts to produce a sense of “powerlessness,” tend to increase relapse and treatment dropout, not recovery. (And the notorious naked LSD encounter sessions conducted with psychopaths made them worse, too.)

Griffiths is currently seeking patients with terminal cancer to participate in his next set of experiments (for more information on these studies, click here); because psychedelics often produce a feeling of going beyond life and death, they are thought to be especially likely to help those facing the end of life. Griffiths is also studying whether psilocybin can help smokers quit.

Griffiths and other researchers like him are hoping to bring the study of psychedelics into the future. They want to build on the promise that some of the early research showed, while avoiding the bad rep and exaggerated claims — for example, that LSD was harmless and could usher in world peace — that became associated with the drugs when people started using them recreationally in the 1960s. The resulting negative publicity helped shut down the burgeoning research.

This time around, caution may be paying off. Dr. Jerome Jaffe, America’s first drug czar, who was not involved with the research, said in a statement, “The Hopkins psilocybin studies clearly demonstrate that this route to the mystical is not to be walked alone. But they have also demonstrated significant and lasting benefits. That raises two questions: could psilocybin-occasioned experiences prove therapeutically useful, for example in dealing with the psychological distress experienced by some terminal patients?

“And should properly-informed citizens, not in distress, be allowed to receive psilocybin for its possible spiritual benefits, as we now allow them to pursue other possibly risky activities such as cosmetic surgery and mountain-climbing?”

The study was published in the journal Psychopharmacology.

It is a generally acknowledged fact in spiritual development that ego reduction makes the influx of God’s grace possible. … I consider LSD to be of some value to some people, and practically no damage to anyone. It will never take the place of any of the existing means by which we can reduce the ego, and keep it reduced.

-Bill Wilson
 
The importance of being in a safe and secure environment for an LSD trip cannot be overstated.
You mean like Woodstock? The "bad trips" there were blamed on "bad acid". I have yet to see any corroborated facts to the contrary.
 
No, I was speaking more generally than beyond simply brown acid. Of course bad acid can result in a bad experience, but that is not the only reason for a bad experience. It has been my experience that the quality of a drug use can vary from user to user and use to use even from the same sheet.
 
Back
Top Bottom