tuckerkao
King
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
- Messages
- 729
As far as I know about the Chinese language, nearly no foreigners(including Philippians and Vietnamese) want to learn that because the pronunciation aren't linked to how the characters looking like.I'm talking about varieties within English. North American Englishes, Carribbean Englishes, Australian and New Zealand Englishes, Indian Englishes, Irish and British Englishes, all of them formal and informal, are equally valid. So Samson staying of England "How they do it is right", ie "the prestige variety of English spoken in London, and the orthography associated with it, is the correct one" is an absolute nonsense.
First, the ease or difficulty of learning a language depends pretty much entirely on the similarity or dissimilarity of the native language of the learner.
Secondly, being able to tell pronunciation from the written form isn't really a big marker of fluency or proficiency, it just means you can say written words out loud.
Thirdly, of all the reasons to name as a reason why English in particular may be easier, "pronunciation can be understood from orthography" is probably the least true. English has one of the least phonetic writing systems out there. Spelling is historical or etymological. It's not as far removed from the spoken language than the very old norms of Tibetan or Thai scripts are from their modern languages, but many European languages and a lot of non-European ones hew a lot closer to the ideal of "see word, know how to say word" than English does.
Almost everybody not too poor has a computer keyboard in every nation, so alphabets A to Z are familiar to most people when they are young despite the native language of the learners in some degrees.