Mini - Madness at 13th Department

[Verarde]

I got BSmith as innocent. So, I'm either sane, naive, or insane.

 

[Verarde]

Hey all, our best bet would be to just vote: abstain. If we kill off more innocents, it becomes harder to compare results.

 

[Optical]

I should clarify this:
sane: gets correct results
naive: always gets "innocent" result
paranoid: always gets "guilty" result
insane: alvays gets opposite result (NOT random): guilty for innocent, innocent for guilty

Awesome, so I'm either one of the sane ones or one of the naive ones.

 

[DaveShack]

My result on Dreadnought was guilty. So the options are insane or paranoid.

 

[Optical]

I suggest that DaveShack, Verarde and I all scan the same person next night. That may give more insight as to what type of cop we each are.

That's three in case the mafia decides to go for one of us, not exactly a slim chance with eight people left.

 

[Mat93]

I received a guilty result on Visorslash. That means I cannot be naive.

vote: no lynch

 

[topsecret]

That death matches my scan result last night. I'm guessing that means I can't be paranoid, I think that means everyone gets scanned mafia. Sane sould be correct all the time, insane would give random results and naive would scan as inncoent all the time so I could be any of those.

Anyone else?

You turned up innocent, but I could be insane or naive

 

[topsecret]

Also, since Dreadnought was going to scan Daveshack, I'd say the mafia is trying to trick us into lynching Dave. He may be innocent.

 

[Mat93]

Sorry Visor...that was RNGed, not intentional.

Optical, I think we shouldn't do more than 2 scans on anyone. If we cover every player with 2 others, then we will be able to figure out who is the scum, out of 2 people.

Lets look at every possible combination of results from 2 scans.

2 innocent: Naive, or Sane. Doesn't really tell us much.

2 guilty: Paranoid, or Insane. Doesn't really tell us much.

1 Guilty and 1 Innocent. This is what we are looking for. If we get this, we cannot possibly be naive, or paranoid. Therefore, we must be either Insane, or Sane. If we are sane, the person we had guilty on is guilty. If we are insane, then the other one is. But either way, we lynch them both, we win.


And I know whoever is the scum is will claim that one, thats why as soon as someone claims that, we should all follow them, but also scan them the night after. If we catch them through that same logic, they are scum, we kill, we win. The moment anyone gets an Innocent result, and a guilty result on 2 different people, we win in 2 rounds. If we have enough people to control the votes.

 

[Optical]

Vote: No Lynch

I want to see anoter night's results from people before we start to lynch possible innocents.

 

[Optical]

Whoops. Crosspost.

Yeah, fair enough.

 

[Optical]

The moment anyone gets an Innocent result, and a guilty result on 2 different people, we win in 2 rounds.

Wrong. We lynched a mafia D1, remember?

 

[Mat93]

Wrong. We lynched a mafia D1, remember?

Yeah, I remember. We know that there is 1 mafia left. As soon as someone claims 1 innocent, 1 guilty result, we know 1 of 3 things. The person claiming is either a sane cop, an insane cop, or mafia trying to throw us off. We kill one of the ones he claims in that phase. We all scan him to see if he is a cop or mafia, through the same logic. If he is, we lynch him. If not, we lynch the other person.

 

[Zack]

I scanned Dreadnought as innocent. I'm either sane or naive.

 

[Optical]

Oh, right. Sorry, I didn't quite follow the logic before.

 

[BSmith1068]

I received a guilty result on Visorslash. That means I cannot be naive.

vote: no lynch

I did too. vote: visorslash. Time to test this out.

 

[Zack]

What exactly is the logic behind the No Lynch vote?

Also, Visorslash cast the lynching vote on JoanK. Risky for Day 1 if he's a scum.

 

[Optical]

Could be sane:
Optical
Zack
Verarde -> if yes, BSmith is innocent
Mat93 -> if yes, Visorslash is mafia
Topsecret

Could be naive:
Optical
Zack
Verarde
Topsecret

Could be paranoid:
Mat93
DaveShack

Could be insane:
Mat93 -> if yes, Visorslash is not mafia
DaveShack
Topsecret

 

[Mat93]

I did too. vote: visorslash. Time to test this out.

I am against that. Check my above post(s). There is a reasonable chance that we are both paranoid or insane.

No need to risk killing a sane or insane cop, the more scans we get the more likely we are to win, just by going through all the results.

 

[Optical]

Bsmith: Could be sane, paranoid or insane.