Houman said:
hehe
@Feilong
We got a new UU for English:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=172057
I need data for this tank.
MarkV has combat 20, cost 120
FT17 shall get combat 21, cost 130
A7V combat 19, cost 110
I suppose it was better than MarkV, but was it better than Renault FT17? What values are being suggested?
Thanks
Houman
Houman,
This tank was worse than MarkV and FT17 tanks.
According to the info available, the Whippet Mk A Tanks were a complement to the MarkV tanks. MarkV were more powerful but slower, while Whippet was a faster and more mobile tank.
What Whippet Tank had in speed lacked in armor and armament. The Whippet was intended as a cavalry style weapon, whose best war results were achieved with large groups of this tanks.
To prove the fact that this tanks only had results in large groups, some experts say they started being used for exploitation, as well as working together with the cavalry.
Regarding the armament, this tanks didn't had no main nor secondary weapons/turrets. This tanks were given given a fixed crew compartment, housing 3 or 4 men, manning 3-4 Hotchkiss MG:s.
As for the armor, the Whippet's were best served than the MarkV's. Whippet's amor was 14mm while MarkV could vary from 6.1 to 12 mm.
After this I would propose:
Whippet Tank
New Promotion (if it's possible??): Horde Bonus: +3% Attack with 8 or more units - If this Promotion could be created it could also be used to other units
Combat: 18 (I think MarkV has 20)
Cost: 118 (I think MarkV is worth 120)
Glad to help
