Most Important Battle in Your Nation's History

I think it's too hard to choose for Britain, we've been in so many which have had major effects on the globe let alone just our nation it's hard to specify just one.

The battle of Britain is no doubt the most iconic one, though.

The second battle of El Alamein is also often seen as a major tuning point of World War 2.
 
You ninja edited the comment about Waterloo being the last French-English battle.

Operation Terminal

Operation Reservist

and there is also the Syria-Lebanon Campaign although there you fought with Free French (Good) against Vichy French (evil).
Yeah, I thought there was probably some I couldn't think of.

Vichy French I don't think really count though, because as you said the Brits sided with the Free French.
 
Beside that, we almost start a war because of Fachoda, but except with Vichy France, I think you were right and we did not fight each other since Waterloo.
Except during Rugby game of course.
 
Beside that, we almost start a war because of Fachoda, but except with Vichy France, I think you were right and we did not fight each other since Waterloo.
Except during Rugby game of course.
Ah okies. In that case i'd say Waterloo was definetely an very important battle for both Britain and France not only in terms of the Napoleaonic era but in the sense that it was the final battle of many that happened over teh ages.
 
I'm from Finland and I the most important battle in my countrys history is obviously the battle of Tali-Ihantala. Fought in WW2 and against russia. That ended WW2 for Finland.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tali-Ihantala

What about the battle of Stalingrad? If Germany had won it, USSR could have been much busier with Germans while Finns would have crushed Leningrad with Germany. Maybe, I'm not sure if that could've happened.
 
I doubt it. Stalingrad, while a huge morale victory wasn't as important as battles such as Moscow.
 
What about the battle of Stalingrad? If Germany had won it, USSR could have been much busier with Germans while Finns would have crushed Leningrad with Germany. Maybe, I'm not sure if that could've happened.
If we take into account battles where we (Finns) weren't participants then possibly. We didn't seem to be all that keen on crushing Leningrad when we were in a position to do something of the kind, though. Or cutting the Murmansk railroad. Hindsight being what it is, the Finnish leadership doesn't seem to have had much love for or trust in the German war effort and was playing for more limited goals.

I'll still stand by my pick. Had our military folded in 1944 our fate post-WW2 would have been vastly different - and most likely not for the better.

Speculating about Stalingrad depends a lot on what sort of victory the Germans might have won. If they had managed to really rout the Russians (a Kiev style encirclement and subsequent isolation and invasion of Caucasus for example) things might have gone very differently. A bloody slugging match victory might not have helped them all that much.
 
The Siege of Humaitá's Stronghold was the decisive battle of the War of the Triple Alliance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Triple_Alliance).
This war defined the borders between Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and Brasil.

This long siege also increased a lot the costs of the war, leading to debts that would weaken the Monarchy. (Its not like this battle destroyed the monarchy, but its costs helped the republican cause).
 
Beside that, we almost start a war because of Fachoda, but except with Vichy France, I think you were right and we did not fight each other since Waterloo.
Except during Rugby game of course.

It might also be worth noting that the first British commander in the Crimea (Baron Raglan or Fitzroy Somerset depending on what you prefer) had a tendency to think that he was fighting the French there. That might sound unusual until you realise that he had actually fought the French with Wellington over 40 years beforehand, and in his advanced years (he was 66 at the time of the Crimean War) had a tendency to forget that he was now fighting the Russians and allied to the French.

I guess old habits die hard. :D

On a serious note the it wasn't uncommon for British army and navy up until the mid 19th Century to have elderly senior officers in charge of it. A combination of the seniority system and the large expansion of both forces during the Napoleonic wars meant that junior officers often remained unpromoted for extensive periods, and senior officers often held their ranks until late retirements or death. The senior Admiral in 1867 had served with Nelson at Copenhagen. Next most senior had served with Wellington in Spain, and the previous most senior admiral (who had only recently died) had seen action in 1777!

I don't have any figures for the Army, but one report commissioned in the 1840s showed the ages of all those in the Royal Navy with the rank of Vice-Admiral and above:

Over 90 ................. 1
Between 90 and 80... 7
Between 80 and 70... 25
Between 60 and 70... 7
Under 65................. 1

Brings a whole new meaning to recruitment drives when they say that the Navy is "A job for life" :lol:
 
There really was only one battle....
 
For Canada, I would have to go with the Battle of the Plains of Abraham which although it came over a hundred years before Confederation did more to shape Canada than any other conflict, and is famous these days for being referred to in the opening verse of "Maple Leaf Forever". 250 years later and there is still a large Quebec population that is quite resentful over the outcome..

Wouldn't you be?

I mean, the issue of whether the Conquest was overall good or bad is still debated, sure (actually, I lean toward more good than bad, personally). But it still remains that Wolfe's victory paved the way for a century or so of being (from our perspective) second-class citizens, and 170 years or thereabout of a forced marriage between French and English people that has been rocky to say the least. Which nobody in their right mind would have liked.

Yeah, most Quebecers are not particularly fond of Wolfe (and even less of Montcalm).

But I have to give it to you, it is the most important battle of Canada's history.

Honorable mentions go to :

-Vimy Ridge (first large-scale battle involving Canadian troops)
-the Battle of the Atlantic (Canada's first time being treated as a major partner by the Allies)
-Operation Overlord (where one of the five beachhead was effectively Canadian)
 
1. Dunnichen (Nechtansmere). the angles of northumberland attempt at conquest. it's been said if the picts lost that one we'd be more english than england!
2. Largs Bay. last effort of the vikings. ended their rule in the western isles.
3. Bannockburn. forget the film.
 
Back
Top Bottom