Yeeek
Seizing The Day
What Navy outside France are equipped with Exocets?
What Navy outside France are equipped with Exocets?
Even aircraft carriers are bound by the laws of physics. Unless the Navy has developed some kind of warp drive that we're not aware of, they cannot travel at 60 knots.
Navys adapt. Today, a phalanx system can destroy the missile so your single hit is not so easy to get. While you cannot do much to stop a shell, except hope your armor is big enoughThough, my point was, naval warfare has changed drastically since the use of missiles. WW2 naval battles were about dive bombers, torpedoes, lucky hits. Today, you could only need a single hit with a missile to sunk a warship.
Is that ship doing a handbrake turn?
Wouldn't catch the Royal Navy carrying out reckless manouvres like that. What, What. We'd spill our tea.Probably checking to make sure everything is secured for sea.![]()
Igloo, you were a former sailor, weren't you? I'm interested by your comments on the topic.
Did you give your opinion and I missed it because of the evil avatar switch?
While the new American subs are better than Russian ones Russias numerical, superiorit would certainly outclass both France, and the UK. Remember submarines can easily knock out things like carriers.
You just finished telling me that longer ranged Chinese missiles are irrelevant because aerial combat would take place mostly at close range (to an extent, a valid point), and then you label the J-7 as a poor dogfighter, a statement that has no basis in reality? I'm confused, what are you trying to say here?.
No, I'm not. Look it up, it's something I highly recommend. The PLAAF possesses 1,800 fighter aircraft and 600 ground attack aircraft. The Japanese Air Force has approximately 330 combat aircraft. The 8 to 1 number does not count transport or utility types.
.
I think within the next 10-20 years the UK may very well move up to 2nd in that list.
With a new generation of nuclear subs mooted and also a vast overhall in surface ships including a couple of 'super carriers' With a proposed specification of 65,000 tonnes displacement each, these will probably be the most modern in the world (if not the largest, a bit smaller than USA super carriers)...
![]()
Nope, the current Nimitz class are 100K tons. The Queen Elizabeth will still be smaller, around the size of a Forrestal class.
I personally watched the Swiss Navy in action. I have to say I doubt there is any other Navy on this earth that could touch them.