Doctor Doom
Warlord
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2013
- Messages
- 187
What do you guys think? I personally believe the Ottomans and The Incans are pretty underrated.
INB4 America
INB4 America
Sweden doesn't get the love it deserves. Caroleans are monsters and it gets so many CS allies from all the Generals you generate in your warmongering.
Sweden doesn't get the love it deserves. Caroleans are monsters and it gets so many CS allies from all the Generals you generate in your warmongering.
I would say Indonesia. Except for on a Pangaea map. Being able to drop a Settler off-continent wherever you want and at least Happiness-neutral is powerful. Their Kris Swordsmen are goofy though.
Until you get to PP and AIs propose to ban your luxuries one after the other as they can't access them anyhow.
I would say Indonesia. Except for on a Pangaea map. Being able to drop a Settler off-continent wherever you want and at least Happiness-neutral is powerful. Their Kris Swordsmen are goofy though.
Does this actually happen? I almost never see AIs ban luxuries unless they're at war with you and even then people vote against them. And for that matter, it seems like bad design that their luxuries can even be banned...
Well, I imagine the WC leaders would be less inclined to propose the ban in the first place if you had been trading it to them already. It seems like something you could anticipate.Happened to me each time I played them. I was essentially bound to trade my last copy to the CS-dominant AI that typicaply proposed it to get him to vote against his own proposal but typically if it is proposed, all AIs without a current (on vote turn) access will vote for the ban.
30 The Ottomans
31 ~ Japan
32 ~ Egypt
33 ~ Polynesia
34 ~ Morocco
35 ~ The Iroquois
36 ~ Byzantium
37 ~ Brazil
38 ~ America
39 ~ Russia
40 ~ Venice
41 ~ India
42 ~ France
43 ~ Denmark