If it is a general consensus, sure thing.Instead of having a lot of -ocracies, why not switch out the more obscure ones for plain English, e.g. Corporate Rule for Corporatocracy, which is both obscure and hard to pronounce.
Anocracy: A regime that permits some means of participation through opposition group behavior but that has incomplete development of mechanisms to redress grievances.Also, after having looked what on earth anocracy was in the first place, why would anyone sign up for a government type typified by ineptitude or inefficiency? Presumably, the Rule civic is who actually rules your country, so leave inefficiency etc. for the anarchy in between civic changes.
Could you give a one-line description of each civic category? I think I can get the gist of what you're driving at, but it would be good to have it straight from the horse's mouth.
If it is a general consensus, sure thing.
POWER
Strongman - Power is only limited to ones capacity to take it.
Counsil - Power is shared with a council
Oligarchy - Power is shared between individuals or entities distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, education, corporate, religious or military control
Republic - Power is shared with elected individuals representing the citizen body.
Sovereignty - Power is held by one individual or entity without outside disturbances.
Seperation of Power - Power is distributed between multiple branches. (typically a presidential system)
Parliamentary System - Less separation of power than a presidential system.
What I don't like with those civics is that they are not mutually exclusive. A parliamentary system usually is in a state with separation of power; a republic can have a separation of power or a parliament for example.
Yes, but the latter is more specific than the former.
I could rename:
Republic→Classical Republic
Seperation of Powers→Modern Republic OR Strong Seperation of Power OR Presidential System.
Any different suggestions to this?
I could remove the two last ones.
I could rename:
Republic→Res publica (Public Affairs) which is what the roman people called their form of government.
Instead of thecnocracy, how about meritocracy, where people are promoted according to their ability and the most able rule the others?
They do seem similar, but "Meritocracy" could apply to most of the other RULE civics, and Technocracy does not have to be a meritocracy. That someone is a professor in economy is by no means a proof of merit that this person would perform well if given an economical authority position. Even an aristocracy could be a meritocracy, the nobility can appoint positions to non-nobility based on merit.Instead of thecnocracy, how about meritocracy, where people are promoted according to their ability and the most able rule the others?
An inherent problem in the definition of those two civic categories. How is power shared when power is taken by the most powerful? It is shared through a contest of power.Strongman and Kratocracy seem to be essentially the same thing.
Well, at least I wrote it correctly in all the excel drafts I've uploaded. ^^I suggest reverting back to Technocracy then (if thecnocracy was intended, rather than a misspelling). That word is at least familiar to fans of sci-fi.
This breaks the game for me. C2C loads fine, but after overwriting the assets folder with your files, it loads and then stops with the following message:
Assert Failed
File: CvArtFileMgr.cpp
Line: 101
SVN-Rev: 7833
Expression: false
Message: ArtInfo: 'ART_DEF_BUILDING_ANTHILL' was not found
If I click ignore, there is another asset it fails to find, and if I click ignore again, the game just crashes.