Core Imposter
Felon
- Joined
- May 13, 2011
- Messages
- 5,461
In my spare time I indulge in critical thought, well, I use that phrase to describe it. I don't really have a better way to describe it to the ordinary people, but, at any rate the point is that I am fairly sure that I have properly sorted out this issue of orign of species.
The two leading theories have been of course creation by God or some sort of more suspect natural form of well, I'd suppose you'd call it evolving. Now, I am not the sort to argue over that much, for whatever material one might think humans could have evolved from necessarily was created by God also, so it is not a particularly important distinction.
However some amount of possibly substantial scientific evidence has been proffered for this. Darwinism, I think it has been called. So it must be given some attention rather than dismissed out of hand.
These scientists postulate more than one species of primitive man, Neanderthal is a name we have all heard. Sapiens of course is supposed to be who we are. And so forth. All labelled hominids, and all extinct but us.
When commonly considered it has been rather naturally assumed that the answer must be, well, one or the other. Either God created man or man evolved. And it has been debated so.
Why, I'd ask, is that the case?
I've grasped that it is far more likely that quite some time after God's initial creation He created Adam and Eve, similar in many respects to these hominids, but in His image, with greater cognitive function and a soul.
The modern humans we are today then are the decendants of both. One second of thought reveals how this clarifies many puzzles of both the Biblical and scientific record.
I realize of course than many if not most of you will require some time to catch up with me on this but nevertheless I am pleased to have given you the benefit of this insight.
The two leading theories have been of course creation by God or some sort of more suspect natural form of well, I'd suppose you'd call it evolving. Now, I am not the sort to argue over that much, for whatever material one might think humans could have evolved from necessarily was created by God also, so it is not a particularly important distinction.
However some amount of possibly substantial scientific evidence has been proffered for this. Darwinism, I think it has been called. So it must be given some attention rather than dismissed out of hand.
These scientists postulate more than one species of primitive man, Neanderthal is a name we have all heard. Sapiens of course is supposed to be who we are. And so forth. All labelled hominids, and all extinct but us.
When commonly considered it has been rather naturally assumed that the answer must be, well, one or the other. Either God created man or man evolved. And it has been debated so.
Why, I'd ask, is that the case?
I've grasped that it is far more likely that quite some time after God's initial creation He created Adam and Eve, similar in many respects to these hominids, but in His image, with greater cognitive function and a soul.
The modern humans we are today then are the decendants of both. One second of thought reveals how this clarifies many puzzles of both the Biblical and scientific record.
I realize of course than many if not most of you will require some time to catch up with me on this but nevertheless I am pleased to have given you the benefit of this insight.
