NES2 V - The Great Game.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stormbringer said:
Deal for Peace with the HRE:

1. New Prussia has to be created, borders will be somewhat similar to what Sweden proposed, details can be discussed, and we need to know more about where Prussians live.
2. Venice is returned to Italy and recognized as Italian
3. Some small concessions to the Swiss, Hungarians and Polish
4. Some sort of an assurance you wont turn on all of us the next turn...*cough*Portugal*cough*
I'm pretty much doing this on my own, thank you. Besides i doupt FK is the one who dictates the foreign policy of hungary, italy, geneva, poland and sweden.
 
Thlayli said:
Not to mention, the HRE won't agree to the deal you just posted...

I doubt the majority of peoples in the territories you just defined are Prussian.

The territories I just defined are part of North Eastern Germany, and Hannover. If you remember the turn in which New Prussia rebelled, most of the territory I defined was underneath their control.

Here's a secondary look at the provinces I defined using a map of the OTL Holy Roman Empire.
 

Attachments

  • map1786.jpg
    map1786.jpg
    318.1 KB · Views: 48
Storm, he just got peace with two nations. I doubt he needs to listen to you when only Poland can really hurt him now.
 
To: Italy, Hungary, Sweden, Switzerland
From: Poland

We think that one formal treaty should be signed, instead of individual peace treaties. We ARE in the same alliance, are we not?

We propose the following of which should be agreed to by ALL parties

-An NAP between all the nations. If HRE breaks this NAP with one nation, it is simultaneously at war with all the rest. (To ensure HRE won't pull a portugal)
-HRE officially declare it's exclusion from its participation in the anti RGC coalition.


Individually, Poland demands the following from HRE:

-Return to pre-war borders between us
-Payment of 1 eco point to pay for damage caused to properties and citizens in Silesia (I'm being generous)
-Either grant the Czech rebels independence or allow the Czech people to have semi-autonomy.

What are your individual terms? We think it should be shared openly, so that a formal and unified treaty can be signed. We do not want a repeat of Persia/Ottoman to happen here. Best to make it clear.
 
and Muscovy faces increasing pressure from Sweden. What's your point?

In case India didn't notice, that diplo wasn't even addressed to HRE. We don't see what you're telling them to bugger us off about.
 
North King said:
To: HRE
From: India

We might humbly suggest telling the Polish to bugger off.
Aye, Sir.

To: Poland
You neither are the one who can dictate the foreign policy of other countries. If Hungary or Swedes wish to sign separate peace, they can do it. You are not their puppet master.

Do you have any proposals to make?
 
ThomAnder said:
To: Italy, Hungary, Sweden, Switzerland
From: Poland

We think that one formal treaty should be signed, instead of individual peace treaties. We ARE in the same alliance, are we not?

We propose the following of which should be agreed to by ALL parties

-An NAP between all the nations. If HRE breaks this NAP with one nation, it is simultaneously at war with all the rest. (To ensure HRE won't pull a portugal)
-HRE officially declare it's exclusion from its participation in the anti RGC coalition.
-A limit on the HRE army.

Individually, Poland demands the following from HRE:

-Return to pre-war borders between us
-Payment of 1 eco point to pay for damage caused to properties and citizens in Silesia (I'm being generous)
-Either grant the Czech rebels independence or allow the Czech people to have semi-autonomy.

What are your individual terms? We think it should be shared openly, so that a formal and unified treaty can be signed. We do not want a repeat of Persia/Ottoman to happen here. Best to make it clear.


The Scandinavian Union agrees, although adds that a limit on the Holy Roman Empire's army is unneeded, since it was the RGC that was the agressors, although for good reasons (some of them, at least). The Scandinivian Union will not agree to peace with the Holy Roman Empire unless such a NAP with New Prussia and the rest of the RGC is signed, and the dropping out of the anti- RGC coalition is added to our own previous agreements, which shall be compiled into one treaty between all nations involved in the Holy Roman Empire war.
 
To: HRE
From: Poland

We are not dictating the foreign policy. If you can read carefully, you would notice that we use the word "propose". That does not = demand.

Our peace proposal will come at the same time as the other members of the RGC.

To: Scandinavian Union
From: Poland

That is reasonable, we will drop the limit on HRE's army. (edited out)
 
ThomAnder said:
and Muscovy faces increasing pressure from Sweden. What's your point?

In case India didn't notice, that diplo wasn't even addressed to HRE. We don't see what you're telling them to bugger us off about.

In case the HRE's codemasters were asleep on the job, we'll note that message was public.
 
Thlayli said:
The peace demands grow ever more irrational as Poland feels increasing pressure from Muscovy...

Thlayli, if you get any more superior and annoying, the Scandinavian Union will seriously consider signing peace with Muscovy just so that we can kick Persia's annoying ass. It is not endearing for a country to comment on every single action that occurs in the world, dictating foriegn policy to other nations. In fact, its quite annoying. So stop. Seriously.
 
How does India, a rebel faction that's not even recognized by nations of the RGC, even get its hand on our diplomacy?

OOC: you shoudl've made your msg to andis OOC :p
 
Contempt said:
Then these would be the new borders of the Kingdom of New Prussia (with the Straslud Republic being combined with the Kingdom).



Woha I'm more Prussian then I thought :D.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom