What kind of requests would that be?Apparently, Firaxis ignores requests on /r/civ (despite it being advertised in Civ VI itself).
What kind of requests would that be?Apparently, Firaxis ignores requests on /r/civ (despite it being advertised in Civ VI itself).
Apparently, Firaxis ignores requests on /r/civ (despite it being advertised in Civ VI itself).
I meant that Firaxis should check replies on Reddit as much as they do here or on other social media channels.What do you mean by that? Example: Fans on reddit hated Queen Seondeok's and Roosevelt's design. Both were redesigned. Okay maybe they would have been anyways but I think they check out that place like they do civfanatics.
It seems pretty obvious to me that they are PAID to fix these problems while we are PAYING to have that problems fixed, it's totally legit to be disappointed if they are not doing their job while we pay them. I can help them if I want to, but I'm not supposed to do it, specially because tons of Civ 6 problems (as it was for Civ beyond earth and in some way for Civ V) are there simply because of lack of playtesting: just to give 1 or 2 example, it seems almost incredible to me that in the first version of the game nobody noticed that the AI was constantly hating everybody (destroying any diplomatic approach to the game) or that now the Kongo's ability TOTALLY doesn't work (they never get the "Founder's belief" bonus of a religion, even if it's in all their cities). I could give 1000000 examples (for real they didn't notice AI doesn't use airplane?? For real they didn't notice that in Civ V the AI could not move and shot in the same turn??) but this post would be too long.Then I guess you won't be disappointed when nothing changes.
I didn't know Civ6 had a monthly subscription or patches for money.It seems pretty obvious to me that they are PAID to fix these problems while we are PAYING to have that problems fixed, it's totally legit to be disappointed if they are not doing their job while we pay them. I can help them if I want to, but I'm not supposed to do it, specially because tons of Civ 6 problems (as it was for Civ beyond earth and in some way for Civ V) are there simply because of lack of playtesting: just to give 1 or 2 example, it seems almost incredible to me that in the first version of the game nobody noticed that the AI was constantly hating everybody (destroying any diplomatic approach to the game) or that now the Kongo's ability TOTALLY doesn't work (they never get the "Founder's belief" bonus of a religion, even if it's in all their cities). I could give 1000000 examples (for real they didn't notice AI doesn't use airplane?? For real they didn't notice that in Civ V the AI could not move and shot in the same turn??) but this post would be too long.
I'm always ready to help a producer to develope a game I like, but saying that the Firaxis approach to the community and to the playtest is TERRIBLE seems pretty obvious to me, and everybody can be totally disappointed about it.
I played the game for 3551 hour, almost never attached anything to something and definitely never put a unit with attachment to sleep.
I won't blame them for not testing a worthless mechanics intended mostly for AI.
I played Kongo in the game before last, I was able to buy campus buildings with faithc and I'm pretty sure that was their Founders Belief. I'll try and remember to check when I get home tonight.or that now the Kongo's ability TOTALLY doesn't work (they never get the "Founder's belief" bonus of a religion, even if it's in all their cities).
Also i hope they'll do something with B-52 and missile cruiser.
Why stealth technology gives you a non-stealth bomber? And missile cruiser is by no means a cruiser. It is a corvette at best if not a missile boat.What's wrong with these units? They are the least problematic units (other than the AI not using bombers correctly). The gaps I find annoying. And the oil problem for tanks mentioned above. We'll just pretend it's renaissance fair all the time when we have knights in the information era.
They could make a B-1 or Tu-160 at least. It won't be that silly.The B-52 is a strange choice. I guess they didn't want to run the B2 again, but given it's place on the tech tree (very late tech), they should have went with that again.
Wtf? The game should work as it's intended, there should not even be a need of a monthly patchI didn't know Civ6 had a monthly subscription or patches for money.
Point is, you are not entitled to anything. Buyer's remorse won't change that.Wtf? The game should work as it's intended, there should not even be a need of a monthly patch
It's a follower belief, not a founder's, so it's normal. Even if you were not Kongo that would have workedI played Kongo in the game before last, I was able to buy campus buildings with faithc and I'm pretty sure that was their Founders Belief. I'll try and remember to check when I get home tonight.
If I pay for a Ferrari and they told I would have received a Ferrari and I receive a bike I can say what I want. I don't even understand how any customer could not agree with this, and you are even assuming that if we don't help for free people paid to do their job we can't say that they did a bad work... I totally don't agree with your point, and for sure if the majority of people have your idea next Civ games will have even more troubles than Civ VI (and they will stop fixing it), perfectPoint is, you are not entitled to anything. Buyer's remorse won't change that.
You paid for a playable game and you got a playable game. You not being happy with it is irrelevant. For that matter, steam even has the option to return it within a certain time/played time, lol.If I pay for a Ferrari and they told I would have received a Ferrari and I receive a bike I can say what I want. I don't even understand how any customer could not agree with this, and you are even assuming that if we don't help for free people paid to do their job we can't say that they did a bad work... I totally don't agree with your point, and for sure if the majority of people have your idea next Civ games will have even more troubles than Civ VI (and they will stop fixing it), perfect
Agreed, it's a superior system. But Firaxis is an American business under totally different laws than the Swedish Paradox, I'm afriad...Edit: Paradox's approach to the community is totally different, they talk with us, they let us know the news in a really direct way, they answer to criticisms etc.... even if you don't like their game I think it's pretty objective that their approach is way better.
You paid for a playable game and you got a playable game. You not being happy with it is irrelevant. For that matter, steam even has the option to return it within a certain time/played time, lol.
In theory, patches are only a courtesy of the developers, though I guess it is in their favour to keep the player base happy. But still, no entitlement.
Agreed, it's a superior system. But Firaxis is an American business under totally different laws than the Swedish Paradox, I'm afriad...
He and Gitarja will get on just swell.
I'm more interested in what new units we could get in this expansions. I think there is a serious gap between knight and tank. Also i hope they'll do something with B-52 and missile cruiser. I know chances are low but this cannot stop bothering me, i don't know what were they thinking.
I meant that Firaxis should check replies on Reddit as much as they do here or on other social media channels.
Point is, you are not entitled to anything. Buyer's remorse won't change that.