edit: with 2 different people I am worried it does, I'll try to fix it
New gods and kings civ formula
- Thread starter tofofnts
- Start date
edit: with 2 different people I am worried it does, I'll try to fix it
The formula can be shortened to this
(P*X)/Y*(Z/P)
Which can be shortened to this
(P*X/Y)*(Z/P)
Which can be shortened to this
(P*A)*(Z/P)
Which can be shortened to this
(P*A*Z)/P
Which can be shortened to this
(P*B)/P
So, yes the 2 Ps cancel each other out. But I am going to remove P from the formula instead of trying to fit it in because: the number of cultural heritage sites made are a reflection of not only the culture, but the population as well (i.e. Rome built more cultural heritage sites than the Pitcairn Islanders for a reason).
(P*X)/Y*(Z/P)
Which can be shortened to this
(P*X/Y)*(Z/P)
Which can be shortened to this
(P*A)*(Z/P)
Which can be shortened to this
(P*A*Z)/P
Which can be shortened to this
(P*B)/P
So, yes the 2 Ps cancel each other out. But I am going to remove P from the formula instead of trying to fit it in because: the number of cultural heritage sites made are a reflection of not only the culture, but the population as well (i.e. Rome built more cultural heritage sites than the Pitcairn Islanders for a reason).
I'm a maths teacher.
Google calculator does use order of operations correctly, my only guess is that what you're typing into the calculator doesn't match your code.
I'm a maths teacher.
Google calculator does use order of operations correctly, my only guess is that what you're typing into the calculator doesn't match your code.
I think when I highlited the formula to copy and paste it I left out a bracket.
stfoskey12
Emperor of Foskania
You should add land area with more than x people per square mile to account for sparsely populated regions.
That will give Canada and Russia huge bonuses for owning useless tundra in northern Canada and siberia.
stfoskey12
Emperor of Foskania
Yes, that's why only areas above a certain population density would be counted. By to account for sparsely populated areas, I meant to account for them being otherwise overrated. Of course, for many things, you would have to estimate.
Good idea, but this data would be tough to find
stfoskey12
Emperor of Foskania
Yes, except for modern-day civilizations who have regular censuses.
Unfortunately, not every civ is a modern day one with regular censuses
Polar Bear
Warlord
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2011
- Messages
- 116
tofofnts, can you explain to me how to calculate your formula properly? I am having trouble with it.
If you give me the data I can probably help
Polar Bear
Warlord
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2011
- Messages
- 116
I posted earlier that I want to work out the formula for the Inuit.
Population at their greatest extent is 150,000. About 1000 years.
For more information. http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?p=11173421#post11173421
AbsintheRed
Deity
I don't think your calculation is too accurate, some of those multipliers are just out of thin air
Nevertheless, I did Hungary for fun
Hungary = 6057
D=1117 (895-2012 in the Carpathian-basin)
MB=1.67
C=8 without GK, additional 5 with GK - wasn't sure what did you use for other European civs
PC=0.74
CH=24 if only counting the ones which were under hungarian rule for at least a couple hundred years (under modern borders: 8 Hungary, 5 Slovakia, 1 Ukraine, 5 Romania, 5 Croatia)
Additional 16 if you really count AGE - mostly from eastern Austria, Bohemia, Silezia and the Bosnia-Serbia region (under Matthias Cornivus)
One could even argue that Hungary ruled Poland and a couple other countries in a personal union on several occasions - most notably under Louis I - but I don't think it's wise to get into personal unions and vassals, it would only mess things up even more. Anyway, if that's the AGE, in that case it would be even more:
Nevertheless, I did Hungary for fun
Hungary = 6057
D=1117 (895-2012 in the Carpathian-basin)
MB=1.67
C=8 without GK, additional 5 with GK - wasn't sure what did you use for other European civs
PC=0.74
CH=24 if only counting the ones which were under hungarian rule for at least a couple hundred years (under modern borders: 8 Hungary, 5 Slovakia, 1 Ukraine, 5 Romania, 5 Croatia)
Additional 16 if you really count AGE - mostly from eastern Austria, Bohemia, Silezia and the Bosnia-Serbia region (under Matthias Cornivus)
One could even argue that Hungary ruled Poland and a couple other countries in a personal union on several occasions - most notably under Louis I - but I don't think it's wise to get into personal unions and vassals, it would only mess things up even more. Anyway, if that's the AGE, in that case it would be even more:
Spoiler :
