New Mafia Hosting Queue

[classical_hero]

We need to get the next large game to sign ups.

 

[topsecret]

Please take my large game off the list, there's no time for it in the foreseeable future.

 

[NinjaCow64]

Okay, here's a revolutionary new idea. Do we even need a Mafia Queue anymore?

 

[topsecret]

 

[Buddhafish]

What it should be is like the NOTW "queue", in my opinion. A rough outline of what games are in design, and whenever one gets close to being done we all start a discussion on who can host when and who will host the next game.

Just my opinion, of course.

 

[Zack]

No, let's just draw out of a hat.

 

[Takhisis]

Let's draw with a hat.

 

[Jarrema]

I think we need a queue

 

[NinjaCow64]

What it should be is like the NOTW "queue", in my opinion. A rough outline of what games are in design, and whenever one gets close to being done we all start a discussion on who can host when and who will host the next game.

Just my opinion, of course.

I agree with this.

 

[dragonprobably]

Listen, Ninja I could take over the queue if you want me to.

I just need permission from the Mafia gods (Zack and choxorn), first.

 

[Zack]

Okay, here's a revolutionary new idea. Do we even need a Mafia Queue anymore?

For the record, this would be reactionary, not revolutionary, since it's a regression to earlier policy, rather than an entirely new system.

But seriously, is anyone ready? I have a couple games ready, but I just hosted, and I host a lot of games.

 

[NinjaCow64]

For the record, this would be reactionary, not revolutionary, since it's a regression to earlier policy, rather than an entirely new system.

But seriously, is anyone ready? I have a couple games ready, but I just hosted, and I host a lot of games.

And that's the fundamental problem with the queue: people go inactive/aren't ready by the time their name comes up. And sure it is reactionary, but it works for IOT, why can't we make it work for us? We might have a limit on the amount of games at a time though, or like a "Don't host two in a month" rule. Or something.

 

[Visorslash]

For the record, this would be reactionary, not revolutionary, since it's a regression to earlier policy, rather than an entirely new system.

But seriously, is anyone ready? I have a couple games ready, but I just hosted, and I host a lot of games.

I could host something, but there wouldn't be too much flavour text due to time constraints. I could host it for any number of players.

 

[johnhughthom]

I have an idea for another of my Rock and Roll Hall of Fame games, I could get sign ups going pretty much immediately.

Never hosted here, but I've hosted a few times elsewhere and played one or two games over the years.

edit: Or I still have the work I did on this game I was going to host over at the org, I could host it here instead and see if I can pull some of the Orgahs that expressed interest over her. The time it took to get sign ups would allow me to finish the rest of the work.

 

[JohannaK]

I am all for the latter option.

 

[Jarrema]

I want Arkham City!

As for me hosting: I would gladly host something in a upcoming week, either large one (vampire-themed), or small one (surprise!)

 

[topsecret]

I'm leaving Saturday, which is why I can't host. But I should be able to host at the end of July.

 

[Zack]

I can start up a small game if no one has anything.

 

[Zack]

I can start up a small game if no one has anything.

Unless anyone objects, I will open up a sign-up thread tomorrow afternoon. This might be the last game I host for awhile, due to time constraints.

Visorslash, john, and Jarrema -- one of you open up a sign-up thread for a large game.

 

[Visorslash]

Let john host something. (Arkham or the Rock and Roll)