Newspaper comics face possible extinction

CivCube

Spicy.
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Messages
5,824
OK, the title is a bit far-fetched. Although we might have seen this coming:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5411755/site/newsweek/

Newspapers: The Un-Funny Pages

Newsweek July 19 issue - The newspaper comics are suffering more indignity these days than Charlie Brown on the football field. In the past year cost-conscious local newspapers in cities like San Francisco, Dallas and Atlanta have reduced the size of their funny pages to save on newsprint and paper. Other publications are considering similar moves. Last January the cash-strapped Philadelphia Inquirer even asked syndicates for some strips free of charge for a year (they declined).

But now there's a whole new reason for comics characters to groan: media consolidation. The major syndicates that distribute the funnies are increasingly dealing not with the individual newspapers, as they're accustomed to, but the big chains that own them—public companies that obsess about earnings growth and cutting costs. In current negotiations, NEWSWEEK has learned, the San Jose, Calif.-based Knight Ridder, which owns 31 daily papers around the country, is demanding a 20 percent reduction in the rates its papers pay for comics, while threatening the cancellation of more than $100,000 worth of business if the syndicates don't comply.

"We're not allowed to collude as syndicates, but they're allowed to blackmail us into reducing rates? It feels wrong," says one beleaguered syndicate exec. (Knight Ridder did not return a request for comment.)

"Dilbert" cartoonist Scott Adams says he worries not only for himself ("Yes, I am that selfish") but for artists trying to break into the business who could inject new life into newspapers. "There are several up-and-coming cartoonists who I have great hope for. If you have fewer spaces, these new guys aren't going to get a chance."

—Brad Stone

© 2004 Newsweek, Inc.

So what do you think? Does this bode something ill in the future for newspaper comics?
 
Hmmm...the funnies are sometimes the only good part of the paper.

Many years ago my local paper had the horoscope and crossword puzzle on the same page as the comics. Then the horoscope got moved to page 2 and now currently is buried somewhere in the classified section along with the crossword puzzle (good move!). So now I have a few more comics to read in the daily paper. However, the Sunday comics seems to have lost a few pages (going from 6+ pages to 4, but 1 page is just kids games and puzzles so it's really only about 3 pages of 'comics').
 
With strips like Goonsbury still around, is it any wonder why papers are picking up less strips?
 
Oh don't fret sharpe, you still have Mallard Fillmore. :p
 
Nooooo...... :cry:

The comics are the very first thing I read in a paper. Before even the headlines. :blush: Yes, I know. Very childish...
 
This is a sign of the coming of the AntiChrist, I can feel it.

I love the comics, especially, Dilbert, The Boondocks, Foxtrot, Doonesbury and of course Calvin and Hobbes(despite the fact that it is over).
 
Nooooo...... :cry:

The comics are the very first thing I read in a paper. Before even the headlines. :blush: Yes, I know. Very childish...

Not childish at all. Comics often make great insights into our society. The only thing that would make most print comics somewhat juvenile would be the way our newspapers handle them. Don't be ashamed to read a medium because of immature stereotypes.

What the <insert choice here> (no more asrerixes thanks to the profanity rules) . I didn't know calvin and hobbes was over . When did this happen .

January 1, 1996. I remember that last Sunday strip so well. :(
 
Good riddance. The newspaper comics are vacuous, insipid, and seriously unfunny. Doonsebury and Dilbert, probably the two most well known comics, are complete and utter crap. There hasnt been anything halfway decent in newspaper comics since Gary Larsens The Far Side.
 
CivCube said:
Not childish at all. Comics often make great insights into our society. The only thing that would make most print comics somewhat juvenile would be the way our newspapers handle them. Don't be ashamed to read a medium because of immature stereotypes.
Thanks for the kind words. Actually I was just playing cute there. I'm one of those supposedly older guys who are NOT obsessed with being cool and buying the latest stuff but am comfortable reading comics, watching cartoons and playing computer games.
CivCube said:
January 1, 1996. I remember that last Sunday strip so well. :(
Sigh... the end of an era. Calvin and Hobbes... one of my favorites. :(
Dumb pothead said:
Good riddance. The newspaper comics are vacuous, insipid, and seriously unfunny. Doonsebury and Dilbert, probably the two most well known comics, are complete and utter crap. There hasnt been anything halfway decent in newspaper comics since Gary Larsens The Far Side.
Doonesbury's sometimes okay for me. Never liked Dilbert much. The Far Side... :worship:
 
THOSE MONSTERS!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't care if they take out some of the stupider comics, but DON'T TOUCH GET FUZZY!!!!!
 
SuperBeaverInc. said:
THOSE MONSTERS!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't care if they take out some of the stupider comics, but DON'T TOUCH GET FUZZY!!!!!
I could not agree more!
 
CivCube said:
Oh don't fret sharpe, you still have Mallard Fillmore. :p

It's not funny because I don't agree with Trudeau's politics, it's not funny because it just isn't funny.
 
Dumb pothead said:
Good riddance. The newspaper comics are vacuous, insipid, and seriously unfunny. Doonsebury and Dilbert, probably the two most well known comics, are complete and utter crap. There hasnt been anything halfway decent in newspaper comics since Gary Larsens The Far Side.
You're right. The Far Side is gone, Garfield has turned into utter stale crap, Dilbert and Foxtrot are only rarely funny, and everything else is just boring. I stopped reading the comics a couple years ago.
 
Will, yeah, its a waste of valuable space. If they werent so deathly afraid of offending somebody, they could use some decent comics instead.

@Dann: Doonesbury is one of those comics that unless youve been reading it for awhile, you have no idea what the guys talking about. Too many 'in' jokes for the casual reader. Also, the few times I did read it, its seemed like it was more concerned with being cool, instead of funny. To me a newspaper comic should be a quick read and chuckle, that you can get digest and understand at a glance. Like the aforementioned Far Side. I understand Zippy is in newspapers on the West Coast. Too bad, if it was available on the East Coast, Id still have faith in the newspaper comic scene.
 
I've noticed that Doonesbury has gotten a little better about the in-jokes. It seems to focus more on story than humor, anyway. I had no idea that Ziggy was still around....
 
Back
Top Bottom