ThePhysicist
Warlord
Wow. New poll, this time from gallup-
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-10-09-poll_x.htm
That's just ridiculus. 23% lead? If that were to hold, the Democrats would gain about 100 seats.
Obviously it greatly overstates the GOP's problems, but still....wow.
Godwynn, the polls before 1994 are very similar to what we're seeing today. The GOP had a 10% generic congressional ballot lead, Clinton was unpopular (though not this unpopular), etc. The thing is though, if you look at the predictions of political scientists the day before the 1994 election, you will notice 2 things-
1. They were very nearly correct at guessing the senate outcome
2. They were way off on the House. On average they predicted about a 20 seat gain for the republicans...they ended up adding more than 50.
So, the truth is we won't know until election day what will really happen (in the House atleast), but the similarities are convincing enough.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-10-09-poll_x.htm
That's just ridiculus. 23% lead? If that were to hold, the Democrats would gain about 100 seats.
Obviously it greatly overstates the GOP's problems, but still....wow.
Godwynn, the polls before 1994 are very similar to what we're seeing today. The GOP had a 10% generic congressional ballot lead, Clinton was unpopular (though not this unpopular), etc. The thing is though, if you look at the predictions of political scientists the day before the 1994 election, you will notice 2 things-
1. They were very nearly correct at guessing the senate outcome
2. They were way off on the House. On average they predicted about a 20 seat gain for the republicans...they ended up adding more than 50.
So, the truth is we won't know until election day what will really happen (in the House atleast), but the similarities are convincing enough.